Preferring balanced vs. advantageous peace agreements: A study of Israeli attitudes towards a two state solution

The paper extends research on fixed-pie perceptions by suggesting that disputants may prefer proposals that are perceived to be equally attractive to both parties (i.e., balanced) rather than one-sided, because balanced agreements are seen as more likely to be successfully implemented. We test our p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepak Malhotra, Jeremy Ginges
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2010-10-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10920/jdm10920.pdf