Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community
Abstract Background The necessity of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) literate population continues to be a high priority worldwide. One approach to build and bolster a STEM-literate workforce is to explore approaches for strengthening the teaching of college-level STEM courses. T...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of STEM Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5 |
id |
doaj-95220b12e55646cea3e9fe3bc821b3cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-95220b12e55646cea3e9fe3bc821b3cc2020-11-25T02:50:28ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222019-08-016111610.1186/s40594-019-0180-5Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning communityTeresa L. Tinnell0Patricia A. S. Ralston1Thomas R. Tretter2Mary E. Mills3Middle and Secondary Department, College of Education and Human Development, University of LouisvilleDepartment of Engineering Fundamentals, J. B. Speed School of Engineering, University of LouisvilleMiddle and Secondary Department, College of Education and Human Development, University of LouisvilleMiddle and Secondary Department, College of Education and Human Development, University of LouisvilleAbstract Background The necessity of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) literate population continues to be a high priority worldwide. One approach to build and bolster a STEM-literate workforce is to explore approaches for strengthening the teaching of college-level STEM courses. The use of collaborative student learning pedagogy is broadly accepted as an effective approach to improve student learning outcomes over traditional methods, such as lecture. How to encourage and sustain the use of such evidence-based teaching practices in STEM fields is a critical topic. To achieve pedagogical change among college faculty, research supports a faculty learning community (FLC) structure. FLCs are a way to facilitate deeper understanding of a topic within a community of practice. Of particular interest for this paper is whether any FLC-supported pedagogical change was sustained by the faculty after the FLC ended and if so why. Results Engineering faculty found success in implementing paradigmatic pedagogical changes by engaging in an FLC that intentionally provided structures to promote a community of practice. This paper reports on the endurance of these pedagogical changes up to 2 years following conclusion of the FLC, with evidence summarizing reasons why many of the faculty had absorbed much of the once-new pedagogical approaches into their ongoing practices. Conclusions FLC structures that faculty credit to their pedagogical change and the enduring impacts of those changes are described. These results offer evidence that it is possible to structure faculty support for them to make enduring pedagogical change, rather than temporary or one-time changes as part of a particular initiative. The findings, discussion, and conclusions of this study are likely to be of interest to faculty developers, innovative university leadership, or faculty exploring ways of sustaining a pedagogical change.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5Sustaining pedagogyFaculty learning communityCommunity of practiceCollaborative student learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Teresa L. Tinnell Patricia A. S. Ralston Thomas R. Tretter Mary E. Mills |
spellingShingle |
Teresa L. Tinnell Patricia A. S. Ralston Thomas R. Tretter Mary E. Mills Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community International Journal of STEM Education Sustaining pedagogy Faculty learning community Community of practice Collaborative student learning |
author_facet |
Teresa L. Tinnell Patricia A. S. Ralston Thomas R. Tretter Mary E. Mills |
author_sort |
Teresa L. Tinnell |
title |
Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
title_short |
Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
title_full |
Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
title_fullStr |
Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
title_sort |
sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
International Journal of STEM Education |
issn |
2196-7822 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The necessity of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) literate population continues to be a high priority worldwide. One approach to build and bolster a STEM-literate workforce is to explore approaches for strengthening the teaching of college-level STEM courses. The use of collaborative student learning pedagogy is broadly accepted as an effective approach to improve student learning outcomes over traditional methods, such as lecture. How to encourage and sustain the use of such evidence-based teaching practices in STEM fields is a critical topic. To achieve pedagogical change among college faculty, research supports a faculty learning community (FLC) structure. FLCs are a way to facilitate deeper understanding of a topic within a community of practice. Of particular interest for this paper is whether any FLC-supported pedagogical change was sustained by the faculty after the FLC ended and if so why. Results Engineering faculty found success in implementing paradigmatic pedagogical changes by engaging in an FLC that intentionally provided structures to promote a community of practice. This paper reports on the endurance of these pedagogical changes up to 2 years following conclusion of the FLC, with evidence summarizing reasons why many of the faculty had absorbed much of the once-new pedagogical approaches into their ongoing practices. Conclusions FLC structures that faculty credit to their pedagogical change and the enduring impacts of those changes are described. These results offer evidence that it is possible to structure faculty support for them to make enduring pedagogical change, rather than temporary or one-time changes as part of a particular initiative. The findings, discussion, and conclusions of this study are likely to be of interest to faculty developers, innovative university leadership, or faculty exploring ways of sustaining a pedagogical change. |
topic |
Sustaining pedagogy Faculty learning community Community of practice Collaborative student learning |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT teresaltinnell sustainingpedagogicalchangeviafacultylearningcommunity AT patriciaasralston sustainingpedagogicalchangeviafacultylearningcommunity AT thomasrtretter sustainingpedagogicalchangeviafacultylearningcommunity AT maryemills sustainingpedagogicalchangeviafacultylearningcommunity |
_version_ |
1724738255247638528 |