Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion

The study investigates dialogic strategies in selected corporate communication of the biotech giants Monsanto and Bayer. Both companies have had to repeatedly face criticism on the part of activists and biotech-averse consumers. In order to win consumer trust and gain social legitimation, the compan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paola Catenaccio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2018-10-01
Series:Altre Modernità
Subjects:
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/10751
id doaj-9660416180174b7dabfcb891be0d84c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9660416180174b7dabfcb891be0d84c32020-11-25T03:10:40ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoAltre Modernità2035-76802018-10-0100486310.13130/2035-7680/107519149Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic IllusionPaola Catenaccio0Università degli Studi di MilanoThe study investigates dialogic strategies in selected corporate communication of the biotech giants Monsanto and Bayer. Both companies have had to repeatedly face criticism on the part of activists and biotech-averse consumers. In order to win consumer trust and gain social legitimation, the companies have put considerable effort into building forms of stakeholder dialogue, resorting, to this end, to computer mediated communication as the preferred means of interaction. Monsanto’s and Bayer’s commitment to engage dialogically with their audiences provides a set of ideal materials for testing if and to what extent new technological affordances are used by companies in the service of stakeholder dialogue on potentially controversial themes. The study analyzes the communicative coordinates and rhetorical organization of communication in two distinct sets of documents – Monsanto’s dedicated “Conversation” website section, and Bayer’s “Transparency Initiative” introductory video. The methodological toolkit used for the analysis is discourse-analytical in focus and draws on tools developed within Systemic Functional linguistics for the analysis of interpersonal resources, and on pragmadialectics for the exploration of the argumentative and rhetorical strategies deployed in the service of persuasion in respect of corporate goodwill/commitment in the face potentially oppositional discourse. The analysis highlights the challenges posed by dialogic overture on controversial issues, and suggests that a tension exists between transparency/openness and discursive foreclosure/gatekeeping which is very hard for companies to negotiate.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/10751stakeholder dialoguediscourse analysisCMC interactionbiotechnology debate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paola Catenaccio
spellingShingle Paola Catenaccio
Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
Altre Modernità
stakeholder dialogue
discourse analysis
CMC interaction
biotechnology debate
author_facet Paola Catenaccio
author_sort Paola Catenaccio
title Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
title_short Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
title_full Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
title_fullStr Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
title_full_unstemmed Web-mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: the Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion
title_sort web-mediated stakeholder communication in the biotech industry: the discursive construction of dialogic illusion
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Altre Modernità
issn 2035-7680
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The study investigates dialogic strategies in selected corporate communication of the biotech giants Monsanto and Bayer. Both companies have had to repeatedly face criticism on the part of activists and biotech-averse consumers. In order to win consumer trust and gain social legitimation, the companies have put considerable effort into building forms of stakeholder dialogue, resorting, to this end, to computer mediated communication as the preferred means of interaction. Monsanto’s and Bayer’s commitment to engage dialogically with their audiences provides a set of ideal materials for testing if and to what extent new technological affordances are used by companies in the service of stakeholder dialogue on potentially controversial themes. The study analyzes the communicative coordinates and rhetorical organization of communication in two distinct sets of documents – Monsanto’s dedicated “Conversation” website section, and Bayer’s “Transparency Initiative” introductory video. The methodological toolkit used for the analysis is discourse-analytical in focus and draws on tools developed within Systemic Functional linguistics for the analysis of interpersonal resources, and on pragmadialectics for the exploration of the argumentative and rhetorical strategies deployed in the service of persuasion in respect of corporate goodwill/commitment in the face potentially oppositional discourse. The analysis highlights the challenges posed by dialogic overture on controversial issues, and suggests that a tension exists between transparency/openness and discursive foreclosure/gatekeeping which is very hard for companies to negotiate.
topic stakeholder dialogue
discourse analysis
CMC interaction
biotechnology debate
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/10751
work_keys_str_mv AT paolacatenaccio webmediatedstakeholdercommunicationinthebiotechindustrythediscursiveconstructionofdialogicillusion
_version_ 1724658076235071488