In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule
Abstract Shortly before he died in October 2017, John Lisman submitted an invited review to Molecular Brain on ‘Criteria for identifying the molecular basis of the engram (CaMKII, PKMζ)’. John had no opportunity to read the referees’ comments, and as a mark of the regard in which he was held by the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Molecular Brain |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13041-018-0419-y |
id |
doaj-99a1e4f246f645e781b82540df3836dc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-99a1e4f246f645e781b82540df3836dc2020-11-25T00:26:24ZengBMCMolecular Brain1756-66062018-12-0111111210.1186/s13041-018-0419-yIn memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory moleculeMark F. Bear0Sam F. Cooke1Karl Peter Giese2Bong-Kiun Kaang3Mary B. Kennedy4Ji-il Kim5Richard G. M. Morris6Pojeong Park7Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKing’s College London, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing’s College London, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National UniversityThe Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National UniversityLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain SciencesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National UniversityAbstract Shortly before he died in October 2017, John Lisman submitted an invited review to Molecular Brain on ‘Criteria for identifying the molecular basis of the engram (CaMKII, PKMζ)’. John had no opportunity to read the referees’ comments, and as a mark of the regard in which he was held by the neuroscience community the Editors decided to publish his review as submitted. This obituary takes the form of a series of commentaries on Lisman’s review. At the same time we are publishing as a separate article a longer response by Todd Sacktor and André Fenton entitled ‘What does LTP tell us about the roles of CaMKII and PKMζ in memory?’ which presents the case for a rival memory molecule, PKMζ.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13041-018-0419-y |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark F. Bear Sam F. Cooke Karl Peter Giese Bong-Kiun Kaang Mary B. Kennedy Ji-il Kim Richard G. M. Morris Pojeong Park |
spellingShingle |
Mark F. Bear Sam F. Cooke Karl Peter Giese Bong-Kiun Kaang Mary B. Kennedy Ji-il Kim Richard G. M. Morris Pojeong Park In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule Molecular Brain |
author_facet |
Mark F. Bear Sam F. Cooke Karl Peter Giese Bong-Kiun Kaang Mary B. Kennedy Ji-il Kim Richard G. M. Morris Pojeong Park |
author_sort |
Mark F. Bear |
title |
In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule |
title_short |
In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule |
title_full |
In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule |
title_fullStr |
In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule |
title_full_unstemmed |
In memoriam: John Lisman – commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule |
title_sort |
in memoriam: john lisman – commentaries on camkii as a memory molecule |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Molecular Brain |
issn |
1756-6606 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Shortly before he died in October 2017, John Lisman submitted an invited review to Molecular Brain on ‘Criteria for identifying the molecular basis of the engram (CaMKII, PKMζ)’. John had no opportunity to read the referees’ comments, and as a mark of the regard in which he was held by the neuroscience community the Editors decided to publish his review as submitted. This obituary takes the form of a series of commentaries on Lisman’s review. At the same time we are publishing as a separate article a longer response by Todd Sacktor and André Fenton entitled ‘What does LTP tell us about the roles of CaMKII and PKMζ in memory?’ which presents the case for a rival memory molecule, PKMζ. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13041-018-0419-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markfbear inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT samfcooke inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT karlpetergiese inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT bongkiunkaang inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT marybkennedy inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT jiilkim inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT richardgmmorris inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule AT pojeongpark inmemoriamjohnlismancommentariesoncamkiiasamemorymolecule |
_version_ |
1725344317174710272 |