A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Cauloba...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-10-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-9b399878511e446dbf56b58fa65f4a77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9b399878511e446dbf56b58fa65f4a772021-07-02T08:11:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852014-10-011210e100197710.1371/journal.pbio.1001977A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.Joshua W ModellTracy K KambaraBarrett S PerchukMichael T LaubCells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joshua W Modell Tracy K Kambara Barrett S Perchuk Michael T Laub |
spellingShingle |
Joshua W Modell Tracy K Kambara Barrett S Perchuk Michael T Laub A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. PLoS Biology |
author_facet |
Joshua W Modell Tracy K Kambara Barrett S Perchuk Michael T Laub |
author_sort |
Joshua W Modell |
title |
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. |
title_short |
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. |
title_full |
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. |
title_fullStr |
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. |
title_sort |
dna damage-induced, sos-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in caulobacter crescentus. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Biology |
issn |
1544-9173 1545-7885 |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joshuawmodell adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT tracykkambara adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT barrettsperchuk adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT michaeltlaub adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT joshuawmodell dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT tracykkambara dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT barrettsperchuk dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus AT michaeltlaub dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus |
_version_ |
1721335021646643200 |