A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.

Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Cauloba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua W Modell, Tracy K Kambara, Barrett S Perchuk, Michael T Laub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-10-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render
id doaj-9b399878511e446dbf56b58fa65f4a77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b399878511e446dbf56b58fa65f4a772021-07-02T08:11:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852014-10-011210e100197710.1371/journal.pbio.1001977A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.Joshua W ModellTracy K KambaraBarrett S PerchukMichael T LaubCells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joshua W Modell
Tracy K Kambara
Barrett S Perchuk
Michael T Laub
spellingShingle Joshua W Modell
Tracy K Kambara
Barrett S Perchuk
Michael T Laub
A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Joshua W Modell
Tracy K Kambara
Barrett S Perchuk
Michael T Laub
author_sort Joshua W Modell
title A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
title_short A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
title_full A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
title_fullStr A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
title_full_unstemmed A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.
title_sort dna damage-induced, sos-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in caulobacter crescentus.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4211646?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuawmodell adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT tracykkambara adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT barrettsperchuk adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT michaeltlaub adnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT joshuawmodell dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT tracykkambara dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT barrettsperchuk dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
AT michaeltlaub dnadamageinducedsosindependentcheckpointregulatescelldivisionincaulobactercrescentus
_version_ 1721335021646643200