Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis

Objective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Probo Yudha Pratama Putra, Arlinda Silva Prameswari, Mochammad Ma'roef, Aida Musyarrofah, Halida Nelasari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021-09-01
Series:Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396
id doaj-9cf2e7374ce84aaebea8fa3d0bcc8b95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cf2e7374ce84aaebea8fa3d0bcc8b952021-09-25T05:09:43ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery2468-90092021-09-01436671Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysisProbo Yudha Pratama Putra0Arlinda Silva Prameswari1Mochammad Ma'roef2Aida Musyarrofah3Halida Nelasari4Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia; Corresponding author: Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Bendungan Sutami Road 188 A, Sumbersari, Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java 65145, Indonesia.Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, General Hospital of University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, General Hospital of University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaObjective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of the two procedures. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library in December 2020. The search terms included “open myomectomy”, “myomectomies”, “laparoscopic”, and “uterine fibroids”. We then selected the randomized control trials published from 1996 to 2019 and compared laparoscopic and open myomectomies. Results: We included 10 studies of 449 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 449 patients who underwent open myomectomy. The data revealed that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with reduced blood loss (MD = −34.43; 95% CI, −34.92 to −33.94; p < 0.001), an attenuated decline in hemoglobin (MD = −1.04; 95% CI, −1.14 to −0.93; p < 0.001), less post-operative pain at 24 h (MD = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.19; p = 0.002), and fewer overall complications (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.71; p = 0.001) relative to open myomectomy; but the former possessed a longer operative time (MD = 12.96; 95% CI, 9.94 to 15.97; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.68; p = 0.33) or recurrence rate of postoperative uterine fibroids (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.18; p = 0.67) between the two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy displayed superior results compared to open myomectomy, although the former involved a longer operating time.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396Uterine fibroidLaparoscopic myomectomyOpen myomectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Probo Yudha Pratama Putra
Arlinda Silva Prameswari
Mochammad Ma'roef
Aida Musyarrofah
Halida Nelasari
spellingShingle Probo Yudha Pratama Putra
Arlinda Silva Prameswari
Mochammad Ma'roef
Aida Musyarrofah
Halida Nelasari
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Uterine fibroid
Laparoscopic myomectomy
Open myomectomy
author_facet Probo Yudha Pratama Putra
Arlinda Silva Prameswari
Mochammad Ma'roef
Aida Musyarrofah
Halida Nelasari
author_sort Probo Yudha Pratama Putra
title Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
title_short Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
title_full Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
title_sort laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: a meta-analysis
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
series Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
issn 2468-9009
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of the two procedures. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library in December 2020. The search terms included “open myomectomy”, “myomectomies”, “laparoscopic”, and “uterine fibroids”. We then selected the randomized control trials published from 1996 to 2019 and compared laparoscopic and open myomectomies. Results: We included 10 studies of 449 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 449 patients who underwent open myomectomy. The data revealed that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with reduced blood loss (MD = −34.43; 95% CI, −34.92 to −33.94; p < 0.001), an attenuated decline in hemoglobin (MD = −1.04; 95% CI, −1.14 to −0.93; p < 0.001), less post-operative pain at 24 h (MD = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.19; p = 0.002), and fewer overall complications (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.71; p = 0.001) relative to open myomectomy; but the former possessed a longer operative time (MD = 12.96; 95% CI, 9.94 to 15.97; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.68; p = 0.33) or recurrence rate of postoperative uterine fibroids (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.18; p = 0.67) between the two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy displayed superior results compared to open myomectomy, although the former involved a longer operating time.
topic Uterine fibroid
Laparoscopic myomectomy
Open myomectomy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396
work_keys_str_mv AT proboyudhapratamaputra laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis
AT arlindasilvaprameswari laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis
AT mochammadmaroef laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis
AT aidamusyarrofah laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis
AT halidanelasari laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis
_version_ 1717368906647076864