Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis
Objective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396 |
id |
doaj-9cf2e7374ce84aaebea8fa3d0bcc8b95 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9cf2e7374ce84aaebea8fa3d0bcc8b952021-09-25T05:09:43ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery2468-90092021-09-01436671Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysisProbo Yudha Pratama Putra0Arlinda Silva Prameswari1Mochammad Ma'roef2Aida Musyarrofah3Halida Nelasari4Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia; Corresponding author: Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Bendungan Sutami Road 188 A, Sumbersari, Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java 65145, Indonesia.Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, General Hospital of University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaDepartment Obstetric and Gynecology, General Hospital of University Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, IndonesiaObjective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of the two procedures. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library in December 2020. The search terms included “open myomectomy”, “myomectomies”, “laparoscopic”, and “uterine fibroids”. We then selected the randomized control trials published from 1996 to 2019 and compared laparoscopic and open myomectomies. Results: We included 10 studies of 449 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 449 patients who underwent open myomectomy. The data revealed that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with reduced blood loss (MD = −34.43; 95% CI, −34.92 to −33.94; p < 0.001), an attenuated decline in hemoglobin (MD = −1.04; 95% CI, −1.14 to −0.93; p < 0.001), less post-operative pain at 24 h (MD = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.19; p = 0.002), and fewer overall complications (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.71; p = 0.001) relative to open myomectomy; but the former possessed a longer operative time (MD = 12.96; 95% CI, 9.94 to 15.97; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.68; p = 0.33) or recurrence rate of postoperative uterine fibroids (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.18; p = 0.67) between the two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy displayed superior results compared to open myomectomy, although the former involved a longer operating time.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396Uterine fibroidLaparoscopic myomectomyOpen myomectomy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Probo Yudha Pratama Putra Arlinda Silva Prameswari Mochammad Ma'roef Aida Musyarrofah Halida Nelasari |
spellingShingle |
Probo Yudha Pratama Putra Arlinda Silva Prameswari Mochammad Ma'roef Aida Musyarrofah Halida Nelasari Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery Uterine fibroid Laparoscopic myomectomy Open myomectomy |
author_facet |
Probo Yudha Pratama Putra Arlinda Silva Prameswari Mochammad Ma'roef Aida Musyarrofah Halida Nelasari |
author_sort |
Probo Yudha Pratama Putra |
title |
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis |
title_short |
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis |
title_full |
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis |
title_sort |
laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: a meta-analysis |
publisher |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
series |
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery |
issn |
2468-9009 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Objective: Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women, and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment. However, both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of the two procedures. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library in December 2020. The search terms included “open myomectomy”, “myomectomies”, “laparoscopic”, and “uterine fibroids”. We then selected the randomized control trials published from 1996 to 2019 and compared laparoscopic and open myomectomies. Results: We included 10 studies of 449 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 449 patients who underwent open myomectomy. The data revealed that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with reduced blood loss (MD = −34.43; 95% CI, −34.92 to −33.94; p < 0.001), an attenuated decline in hemoglobin (MD = −1.04; 95% CI, −1.14 to −0.93; p < 0.001), less post-operative pain at 24 h (MD = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.19; p = 0.002), and fewer overall complications (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.71; p = 0.001) relative to open myomectomy; but the former possessed a longer operative time (MD = 12.96; 95% CI, 9.94 to 15.97; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.68; p = 0.33) or recurrence rate of postoperative uterine fibroids (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.18; p = 0.67) between the two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy displayed superior results compared to open myomectomy, although the former involved a longer operating time. |
topic |
Uterine fibroid Laparoscopic myomectomy Open myomectomy |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000396 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT proboyudhapratamaputra laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis AT arlindasilvaprameswari laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis AT mochammadmaroef laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis AT aidamusyarrofah laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis AT halidanelasari laparoscopicmyomectomyversusopenmyomectomyinuterinefibroidtreatmentametaanalysis |
_version_ |
1717368906647076864 |