Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form

Theories of threat appeals have been rightly concerned with the form of the relationship between fear and persuasion: Linear or curvilinear. They have not, however, clearly distinguished the question as a between- or within-persons phenomenon. In fact, the literature often treats these two perspecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lijiang Shen, James Price Dillard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Review of Communication Research 2014-01-01
Series:Review of Communication Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/articles/volume2-2014/viewdownload/13-volume-2-2014/26-shen-dillard-2014-threat-fear-and-persuasion
id doaj-9de369ea6f5249a294fdb07fca8e8593
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9de369ea6f5249a294fdb07fca8e85932020-11-25T02:18:24ZengReview of Communication ResearchReview of Communication Research2255-41652014-01-01219411410.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.004Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional FormLijiang ShenJames Price DillardTheories of threat appeals have been rightly concerned with the form of the relationship between fear and persuasion: Linear or curvilinear. They have not, however, clearly distinguished the question as a between- or within-persons phenomenon. In fact, the literature often treats these two perspectives as if they were interchangeable. We show that between- versus within-person questions about functional form are distinct from one another. Previous research, which is the product of between-persons designs, shows a linear relationship between fear and persuasion. Betweenpersons studies cannot address the question of how changes in fear over time produce persuasion. Consequently, a major piece of the fear appeals-persuasion puzzle may have been overlooked. Reanalysis of an existing data set shows curvilinearity of fear in within-persons data and demonstrates that the curve predicts persuasion. Audience segmentation reveals different curves for different groups as well as differential associations between those curves and persuasion. Overall, the argument and the empirical results suggest that a great deal less is known about fear appeals than it is currently believed. http://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/articles/volume2-2014/viewdownload/13-volume-2-2014/26-shen-dillard-2014-threat-fear-and-persuasiondrive modelparallel processingEPPMthreatfearpersuasionlatent growth curve modelinghealthinfluenza
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lijiang Shen
James Price Dillard
spellingShingle Lijiang Shen
James Price Dillard
Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
Review of Communication Research
drive model
parallel processing
EPPM
threat
fear
persuasion
latent growth curve modeling
health
influenza
author_facet Lijiang Shen
James Price Dillard
author_sort Lijiang Shen
title Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
title_short Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
title_full Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
title_fullStr Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
title_full_unstemmed Threat, Fear, and Persuasion: Review and Critique of Questions About Functional Form
title_sort threat, fear, and persuasion: review and critique of questions about functional form
publisher Review of Communication Research
series Review of Communication Research
issn 2255-4165
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Theories of threat appeals have been rightly concerned with the form of the relationship between fear and persuasion: Linear or curvilinear. They have not, however, clearly distinguished the question as a between- or within-persons phenomenon. In fact, the literature often treats these two perspectives as if they were interchangeable. We show that between- versus within-person questions about functional form are distinct from one another. Previous research, which is the product of between-persons designs, shows a linear relationship between fear and persuasion. Betweenpersons studies cannot address the question of how changes in fear over time produce persuasion. Consequently, a major piece of the fear appeals-persuasion puzzle may have been overlooked. Reanalysis of an existing data set shows curvilinearity of fear in within-persons data and demonstrates that the curve predicts persuasion. Audience segmentation reveals different curves for different groups as well as differential associations between those curves and persuasion. Overall, the argument and the empirical results suggest that a great deal less is known about fear appeals than it is currently believed.
topic drive model
parallel processing
EPPM
threat
fear
persuasion
latent growth curve modeling
health
influenza
url http://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/articles/volume2-2014/viewdownload/13-volume-2-2014/26-shen-dillard-2014-threat-fear-and-persuasion
work_keys_str_mv AT lijiangshen threatfearandpersuasionreviewandcritiqueofquestionsaboutfunctionalform
AT jamespricedillard threatfearandpersuasionreviewandcritiqueofquestionsaboutfunctionalform
_version_ 1724882400644694016