Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?

Reading-response research has shown that students respond to a text by engaging various cognitive and emotional processes. The aim of the current study was to examine students’ written reactions to an assigned reading as a way to determine (1) whether students connect with the reading and (2) the di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taleen Nalabandian, Roman Taraban, Jessica C. Pittman, Sage Maliepaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University 2020-06-01
Series:East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/290/228
id doaj-9eaddb68b2db41569280464312775e7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9eaddb68b2db41569280464312775e7a2021-05-03T02:30:36ZengLesya Ukrainka Volyn National UniversityEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics2312-32652313-21162020-06-017112813910.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.nalAssessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?Taleen Nalabandian0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-7341Roman Taraban1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-4687Jessica C. Pittman 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-3691Sage Maliepaard 3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-6790Texas Tech University, USA Texas Tech University, USA Texas Tech University, USATexas Tech University, USA Reading-response research has shown that students respond to a text by engaging various cognitive and emotional processes. The aim of the current study was to examine students’ written reactions to an assigned reading as a way to determine (1) whether students connect with the reading and (2) the differing cognitive styles they may utilize in their reactions. The methods applied two text-analytic procedures to 238 student reactions to an ethics case study. The procedures were language style matching, which is a metric of engagement, and the categorical-dynamic index, which is a metric of analytic and experiential processing. We predicted that students who more strongly connected—or engaged—with the text would also demonstrate greater analytic thinking in their written response and, conversely, those who weakly connected with the text would express a more informal response based on experience. The data were analyzed using correlation statistics. The results showed that students whose writing more closely matched with the linguistic style of the case study were more likely to use an analytical style of writing, and students whose writing weakly matched the linguistic style of the case study were more likely to use an informal narrative style of writing. Future research should examine the extent to which language style matching and an associated analytic cognitive style are emergent skills that develop over the course of a college experience.http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/290/228language style matchingcategorical-dynamic indexacademic writingcomputerized text analysisliwc
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taleen Nalabandian
Roman Taraban
Jessica C. Pittman
Sage Maliepaard
spellingShingle Taleen Nalabandian
Roman Taraban
Jessica C. Pittman
Sage Maliepaard
Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
language style matching
categorical-dynamic index
academic writing
computerized text analysis
liwc
author_facet Taleen Nalabandian
Roman Taraban
Jessica C. Pittman
Sage Maliepaard
author_sort Taleen Nalabandian
title Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
title_short Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
title_full Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
title_fullStr Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
title_full_unstemmed Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text?
title_sort assessing college writing: do students connect with the text?
publisher Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
series East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
issn 2312-3265
2313-2116
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Reading-response research has shown that students respond to a text by engaging various cognitive and emotional processes. The aim of the current study was to examine students’ written reactions to an assigned reading as a way to determine (1) whether students connect with the reading and (2) the differing cognitive styles they may utilize in their reactions. The methods applied two text-analytic procedures to 238 student reactions to an ethics case study. The procedures were language style matching, which is a metric of engagement, and the categorical-dynamic index, which is a metric of analytic and experiential processing. We predicted that students who more strongly connected—or engaged—with the text would also demonstrate greater analytic thinking in their written response and, conversely, those who weakly connected with the text would express a more informal response based on experience. The data were analyzed using correlation statistics. The results showed that students whose writing more closely matched with the linguistic style of the case study were more likely to use an analytical style of writing, and students whose writing weakly matched the linguistic style of the case study were more likely to use an informal narrative style of writing. Future research should examine the extent to which language style matching and an associated analytic cognitive style are emergent skills that develop over the course of a college experience.
topic language style matching
categorical-dynamic index
academic writing
computerized text analysis
liwc
url http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/290/228
work_keys_str_mv AT taleennalabandian assessingcollegewritingdostudentsconnectwiththetext
AT romantaraban assessingcollegewritingdostudentsconnectwiththetext
AT jessicacpittman assessingcollegewritingdostudentsconnectwiththetext
AT sagemaliepaard assessingcollegewritingdostudentsconnectwiththetext
_version_ 1721485256311177216