Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics

We used a sequential synthesis problem to investigate novice teachers’ conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics. Twenty-one new secondary level physics teachers from various regions of China, who had been in service for no more than 2 years, participated in the study. Each participant completed a wr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zehao Jia, Lin Ding, Ping Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2021-06-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010142
id doaj-a1dc825b7d19428db84feb646c5b6db6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1dc825b7d19428db84feb646c5b6db62021-06-21T17:49:11ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962021-06-0117101014210.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010142Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamicsZehao JiaLin DingPing ZhangWe used a sequential synthesis problem to investigate novice teachers’ conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics. Twenty-one new secondary level physics teachers from various regions of China, who had been in service for no more than 2 years, participated in the study. Each participant completed a written hydrodynamics problem consisting of four questions, all of which were related to a situation about water flowing in a long, nonuniform tube of different cross sections, heights, and orientations. Analysis of the teachers’ written performances exposed a number of errors. To further investigate their underlying notions about hydrodynamics, we conducted one-on-one interviews with 13 teachers selected randomly from those making such errors on the written test. The interviews revealed three major categories of errors about hydrodynamics held by our novice teachers. These relate to (a) ontological confusions and misuse of properties associated with solid, liquid, and gas; (b) deficient perceptions of force-motion and work-energy analysis; and (c) mischaracterizations about the nature of Bernoulli’s equation and the quantities therein. Here, we not only replicated some of the literature-reported misconceptions but also uncovered new ontological notions of hydrodynamics held by physics teachers, an underresearched population on this topic.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010142
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zehao Jia
Lin Ding
Ping Zhang
spellingShingle Zehao Jia
Lin Ding
Ping Zhang
Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Zehao Jia
Lin Ding
Ping Zhang
author_sort Zehao Jia
title Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
title_short Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
title_full Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
title_fullStr Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
title_full_unstemmed Using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
title_sort using sequential synthesis problems to investigate novice teachers’ conceptions of hydrodynamics
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2021-06-01
description We used a sequential synthesis problem to investigate novice teachers’ conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics. Twenty-one new secondary level physics teachers from various regions of China, who had been in service for no more than 2 years, participated in the study. Each participant completed a written hydrodynamics problem consisting of four questions, all of which were related to a situation about water flowing in a long, nonuniform tube of different cross sections, heights, and orientations. Analysis of the teachers’ written performances exposed a number of errors. To further investigate their underlying notions about hydrodynamics, we conducted one-on-one interviews with 13 teachers selected randomly from those making such errors on the written test. The interviews revealed three major categories of errors about hydrodynamics held by our novice teachers. These relate to (a) ontological confusions and misuse of properties associated with solid, liquid, and gas; (b) deficient perceptions of force-motion and work-energy analysis; and (c) mischaracterizations about the nature of Bernoulli’s equation and the quantities therein. Here, we not only replicated some of the literature-reported misconceptions but also uncovered new ontological notions of hydrodynamics held by physics teachers, an underresearched population on this topic.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010142
work_keys_str_mv AT zehaojia usingsequentialsynthesisproblemstoinvestigatenoviceteachersconceptionsofhydrodynamics
AT linding usingsequentialsynthesisproblemstoinvestigatenoviceteachersconceptionsofhydrodynamics
AT pingzhang usingsequentialsynthesisproblemstoinvestigatenoviceteachersconceptionsofhydrodynamics
_version_ 1721364153942147072