Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.

Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.

Poor reporting quality may contribute to irreproducibility of results and failed 'bench-to-bedside' translation. Consequently, guidelines have been developed to improve the complete and transparent reporting of in vivo preclinical studies. To examine the impact of such guidelines on core m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dean A Fergusson, Marc T Avey, Carly C Barron, Mathew Bocock, Kristen E Biefer, Sylvain Boet, Stephane L Bourque, Isidora Conic, Kai Chen, Yuan Yi Dong, Grace M Fox, Ronald B George, Neil M Goldenberg, Ferrante S Gragasin, Prathiba Harsha, Patrick J Hong, Tyler E James, Sarah M Larrigan, Jenna L MacNeil, Courtney A Manuel, Sarah Maximos, David Mazer, Rohan Mittal, Ryan McGinn, Long H Nguyen, Abhilasha Patel, Philippe Richebé, Tarit K Saha, Benjamin E Steinberg, Sonja D Sampson, Duncan J Stewart, Summer Syed, Kimberly Vella, Neil L Wesch, Manoj M Lalu, Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221

Similar Items