A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area
Objective The aim was to compare and document the aesthetic influences on peri⁃implant soft tissues between the immediate and early implant placement in the aesthetic area. Methods 22 patients with single anterior teeth missing were included and divided into 2 group. Group A (12cases): Following t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2017-04-01
|
Series: | 口腔疾病防治 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.04.009 |
id |
doaj-a84d752350054fa48c0c0e57e3dc9a57 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a84d752350054fa48c0c0e57e3dc9a572020-11-25T01:15:06ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases口腔疾病防治2096-14562096-14562017-04-0125424524910.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2017.04.009A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic areaGUO Lei0HONG Feng1WANG Yuan⁃qin2 Affiliated Huizhou Stomatological Hos⁃ pital of Medical College, Jinan University Affiliated Huizhou Stomatological Hos⁃ pital of Medical College, Jinan University Affiliated Huizhou Stomatological Hos⁃ pital of Medical College, Jinan UniversityObjective The aim was to compare and document the aesthetic influences on peri⁃implant soft tissues between the immediate and early implant placement in the aesthetic area. Methods 22 patients with single anterior teeth missing were included and divided into 2 group. Group A (12cases): Following the extraction of teeth, 12 Zimmer implants were immediately placed into sockets. Group B (10 cases): 4~8 weeks after the extraction, 10 Zimmer im⁃ plants were early placed into the healing sockets. Zirconia crowns were applied on the implants 6 months later after im⁃ plantation. The peri⁃implant soft tissues in both group were examined and evaluated by pink esthetic score (PES) 6~12 months later. Analysis of the data was performed by software SPSS 13.0. Results The mean PES was 9.27 (clinical ac⁃ ceptance) for all of the implants. No significant were found for any of the parameters between the treatment modalities regardness of total PES or single PES. However there were significant differences in the following aspects: the correla⁃ tion between periodontal disease and papilla, the correlation between gingival biotype and mesial papilla, the correlation between gingival biotype and alveolar process deficiency, the correlation between Implant location and midfacial soft tis⁃ sue level. Conclusion There are no significant differences between immediate placement and early placement on the aesthetic outcome of peri⁃implant soft tissues. The aesthetic outcome are related to patients oral health condition and cli⁃ nicians skills. http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.04.009Immediate placementEarly placementSoft tissueGingivaAesthetics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
zho |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
GUO Lei HONG Feng WANG Yuan⁃qin |
spellingShingle |
GUO Lei HONG Feng WANG Yuan⁃qin A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area 口腔疾病防治 Immediate placement Early placement Soft tissue Gingiva Aesthetics |
author_facet |
GUO Lei HONG Feng WANG Yuan⁃qin |
author_sort |
GUO Lei |
title |
A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
title_short |
A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
title_full |
A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
title_fullStr |
A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
title_sort |
comparative study between the immediate and early implant on the aesthetic influences of the peri⁃implant soft tissues in the aesthetic area |
publisher |
Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases |
series |
口腔疾病防治 |
issn |
2096-1456 2096-1456 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Objective The aim was to compare and document the aesthetic influences on peri⁃implant soft tissues
between the immediate and early implant placement in the aesthetic area. Methods 22 patients with single anterior
teeth missing were included and divided into 2 group. Group A (12cases): Following the extraction of teeth, 12 Zimmer
implants were immediately placed into sockets. Group B (10 cases): 4~8 weeks after the extraction, 10 Zimmer im⁃
plants were early placed into the healing sockets. Zirconia crowns were applied on the implants 6 months later after im⁃
plantation. The peri⁃implant soft tissues in both group were examined and evaluated by pink esthetic score (PES) 6~12
months later. Analysis of the data was performed by software SPSS 13.0. Results The mean PES was 9.27 (clinical ac⁃
ceptance) for all of the implants. No significant were found for any of the parameters between the treatment modalities
regardness of total PES or single PES. However there were significant differences in the following aspects: the correla⁃
tion between periodontal disease and papilla, the correlation between gingival biotype and mesial papilla, the correlation
between gingival biotype and alveolar process deficiency, the correlation between Implant location and midfacial soft tis⁃
sue level. Conclusion There are no significant differences between immediate placement and early placement on the
aesthetic outcome of peri⁃implant soft tissues. The aesthetic outcome are related to patients oral health condition and cli⁃
nicians skills.
|
topic |
Immediate placement Early placement Soft tissue Gingiva Aesthetics |
url |
http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guolei acomparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea AT hongfeng acomparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea AT wangyuanqin acomparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea AT guolei comparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea AT hongfeng comparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea AT wangyuanqin comparativestudybetweentheimmediateandearlyimplantontheaestheticinfluencesoftheperiimplantsofttissuesintheaestheticarea |
_version_ |
1725154439523729408 |