Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation

This study was an attempt to investigate the comparative impact of convergent and divergent condition tasks on EFL learners’ writing and motivation. Sixty female intermediate EFL learners were selected from among a total number of 90 through their performance on a sample piloted PET and further homo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamid Marashi, Parissa Tahan-Shizari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urmia University 2015-01-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr/Lists/Current%20Issue/Attachments/13/(6).pdf
id doaj-a9e761c67140472287317fd68a603e05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9e761c67140472287317fd68a603e052020-11-25T01:05:54ZengUrmia UniversityIranian Journal of Language Teaching Research2322-12912322-12912015-01-013199117Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivationHamid Marashi0Parissa Tahan-Shizari1Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran BranchIslamic Azad University, North Tehran BranchThis study was an attempt to investigate the comparative impact of convergent and divergent condition tasks on EFL learners’ writing and motivation. Sixty female intermediate EFL learners were selected from among a total number of 90 through their performance on a sample piloted PET and further homogenized in terms of their writing and motivation. Based on the results, the students were randomly assigned to two experimental groups with 30 participants in each. Both groups underwent the same amount of teaching time during 18 sessions of treatment which included using divergent tasks for the first group and convergent tasks for the second. A posttest (the writing section of another sample PET) and Gardener’s Attitude and Motivation Test Battery (used also earlier for the homogenization) were administered at the end of the treatment to both groups and their mean scores on the test were compared through independent samples t-tests. The results led to the rejection of the first null hypothesis, thereby demonstrating that the learners in the convergent group benefited significantly more than those in the divergent group in terms of improving their writing. The second null hypothesis was not rejected, however, meaning that the two treatments were not significantly different in terms of improving the learners’ motivation.http://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr/Lists/Current%20Issue/Attachments/13/(6).pdfConvergent/divergent tasksWritingMotivation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamid Marashi
Parissa Tahan-Shizari
spellingShingle Hamid Marashi
Parissa Tahan-Shizari
Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
Convergent/divergent tasks
Writing
Motivation
author_facet Hamid Marashi
Parissa Tahan-Shizari
author_sort Hamid Marashi
title Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
title_short Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
title_full Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
title_fullStr Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
title_full_unstemmed Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
title_sort using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation
publisher Urmia University
series Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
issn 2322-1291
2322-1291
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This study was an attempt to investigate the comparative impact of convergent and divergent condition tasks on EFL learners’ writing and motivation. Sixty female intermediate EFL learners were selected from among a total number of 90 through their performance on a sample piloted PET and further homogenized in terms of their writing and motivation. Based on the results, the students were randomly assigned to two experimental groups with 30 participants in each. Both groups underwent the same amount of teaching time during 18 sessions of treatment which included using divergent tasks for the first group and convergent tasks for the second. A posttest (the writing section of another sample PET) and Gardener’s Attitude and Motivation Test Battery (used also earlier for the homogenization) were administered at the end of the treatment to both groups and their mean scores on the test were compared through independent samples t-tests. The results led to the rejection of the first null hypothesis, thereby demonstrating that the learners in the convergent group benefited significantly more than those in the divergent group in terms of improving their writing. The second null hypothesis was not rejected, however, meaning that the two treatments were not significantly different in terms of improving the learners’ motivation.
topic Convergent/divergent tasks
Writing
Motivation
url http://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr/Lists/Current%20Issue/Attachments/13/(6).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidmarashi usingconvergentanddivergenttaskstoimprovewritingandlanguagelearningmotivation
AT parissatahanshizari usingconvergentanddivergenttaskstoimprovewritingandlanguagelearningmotivation
_version_ 1725192637999218688