The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings

Two experiments were conducted to examine the relationship between the objective and subjective effects of disruption caused by auditory stimuli on daily cognitive tasks. Reading with/without proofreading task (for Experiment 1) and reading with/without map task (for Experiment 2) were used as cogni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michiko Miyahara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic811
id doaj-ac8c0f6db0e14828b002bc2e4ff20b75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac8c0f6db0e14828b002bc2e4ff20b752020-11-25T03:34:06ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-10-01210.1068/ic81110.1068_ic811The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective RatingsMichiko Miyahara0Kyoto Seibo collegeTwo experiments were conducted to examine the relationship between the objective and subjective effects of disruption caused by auditory stimuli on daily cognitive tasks. Reading with/without proofreading task (for Experiment 1) and reading with/without map task (for Experiment 2) were used as cognitive activities. The speech and office noise were used as auditory stimuli for Experiment 1 and 2. The increase of recall error rate under each auditory condition was used as an objective index of disruption. Two subjective indexes, self estimated performance and self rated annoyance under each auditory stimulus were used as a subjective index to assess the perceived adverse effect of the auditory stimuli. The error rate increased significantly under the auditory stimuli conditions in the reading with proofreading task (Experiment 1) and reading with/without map tasks (Experiment 2). The error rate increased significantly in the reading with proofreading task only under the office noise condition. The results show that estimated performance was generally in agreement with the recall error rate pattern. On the other hand, the annoyance ratings did not match recall performance. The agreement and discrepancy of objective and subjective indexes should be investigated in future experiments.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic811
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michiko Miyahara
spellingShingle Michiko Miyahara
The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
i-Perception
author_facet Michiko Miyahara
author_sort Michiko Miyahara
title The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
title_short The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
title_full The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
title_fullStr The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Cognitive Tasks: Objective Performance and Subjective Ratings
title_sort effect of auditory stimuli on cognitive tasks: objective performance and subjective ratings
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Two experiments were conducted to examine the relationship between the objective and subjective effects of disruption caused by auditory stimuli on daily cognitive tasks. Reading with/without proofreading task (for Experiment 1) and reading with/without map task (for Experiment 2) were used as cognitive activities. The speech and office noise were used as auditory stimuli for Experiment 1 and 2. The increase of recall error rate under each auditory condition was used as an objective index of disruption. Two subjective indexes, self estimated performance and self rated annoyance under each auditory stimulus were used as a subjective index to assess the perceived adverse effect of the auditory stimuli. The error rate increased significantly under the auditory stimuli conditions in the reading with proofreading task (Experiment 1) and reading with/without map tasks (Experiment 2). The error rate increased significantly in the reading with proofreading task only under the office noise condition. The results show that estimated performance was generally in agreement with the recall error rate pattern. On the other hand, the annoyance ratings did not match recall performance. The agreement and discrepancy of objective and subjective indexes should be investigated in future experiments.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic811
work_keys_str_mv AT michikomiyahara theeffectofauditorystimulioncognitivetasksobjectiveperformanceandsubjectiveratings
AT michikomiyahara effectofauditorystimulioncognitivetasksobjectiveperformanceandsubjectiveratings
_version_ 1724560556495470592