Prémisses indéniables, mais dialogue de sourds quand même : la liberté d’expression au prisme d’une votation helvétique (initiative « muselière »)
Is it possible to argue about something as universal as human rights, defined as an agreement transcending cultural differences? When there is a general consensus around some principles, can argumentative breaks between two opponents still occur? A case study drawing on texts aimed at influencing th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
University of Tel-Aviv
2010-04-01
|
| Series: | Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/aad/776 |