The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models

The aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annisa Restu Wardhany, Gufron Amirullah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UHAMKA Press 2017-07-01
Series:Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
Online Access:http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52
id doaj-b9143ea4ecac4bc4849d5ad2315627f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9143ea4ecac4bc4849d5ad2315627f62020-11-25T00:06:37ZengUHAMKA PressJurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar2477-38592477-35812017-07-0122677452The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning ModelsAnnisa Restu Wardhany0Gufron Amirullah1Sekolah Dasar Islam Al-FikriUniversitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKAThe aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 students for second experiment group (VB). Sampling technique was a saturated sampling. The data was collected using multiple choice test that was consist of 30 questions with four choice for the answer. The normality of posttest data was analyzed by using Liliefors test which obtained that both of two experiment groups were normal distributed and the homogeneity of posttest data was analyzed by using Fisher test which obtained that both of them had a similar variance. Based on t-test result, tobs was obtained 3.46 and ttable was obtained 2.00 with df = 60 and alpha = 0.05, therefore, H0 was rejected. The result of this research can be concluded that there was a significant difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models.http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annisa Restu Wardhany
Gufron Amirullah
spellingShingle Annisa Restu Wardhany
Gufron Amirullah
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
author_facet Annisa Restu Wardhany
Gufron Amirullah
author_sort Annisa Restu Wardhany
title The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
title_short The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
title_full The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
title_fullStr The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
title_full_unstemmed The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
title_sort difference of science learning outcome using think talk write (ttw) and think pair share (tps) learning models
publisher UHAMKA Press
series Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
issn 2477-3859
2477-3581
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 students for second experiment group (VB). Sampling technique was a saturated sampling. The data was collected using multiple choice test that was consist of 30 questions with four choice for the answer. The normality of posttest data was analyzed by using Liliefors test which obtained that both of two experiment groups were normal distributed and the homogeneity of posttest data was analyzed by using Fisher test which obtained that both of them had a similar variance. Based on t-test result, tobs was obtained 3.46 and ttable was obtained 2.00 with df = 60 and alpha = 0.05, therefore, H0 was rejected. The result of this research can be concluded that there was a significant difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models.
url http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52
work_keys_str_mv AT annisarestuwardhany thedifferenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels
AT gufronamirullah thedifferenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels
AT annisarestuwardhany differenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels
AT gufronamirullah differenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels
_version_ 1725421092873437184