Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Cook, Jennifer Hislop, Temitope Adewuyi, Kirsten Harrild, Douglas Altman, Craig Ramsay, Cynthia Fraser, Brian Buckley, Peter Fayers, Ian Harvey, Andrew Briggs, John Norrie, Dean Fergusson, Ian Ford, Luke Vale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2014-01-01
Series:Health Technology Assessment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18280
id doaj-b9d9e7adc101402b8c6c2a285b357d4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9d9e7adc101402b8c6c2a285b357d4a2020-11-24T23:11:31ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782014-01-01182810.3310/hta1828006/98/01Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) reviewJonathan Cook0Jennifer Hislop1Temitope Adewuyi2Kirsten Harrild3Douglas Altman4Craig Ramsay5Cynthia Fraser6Brian Buckley7Peter Fayers8Ian Harvey9Andrew Briggs10John Norrie11Dean Fergusson12Ian Ford13Luke Vale14Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKMedical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKDepartment of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandPopulation Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, CanadaRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKhttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta18280
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Cook
Jennifer Hislop
Temitope Adewuyi
Kirsten Harrild
Douglas Altman
Craig Ramsay
Cynthia Fraser
Brian Buckley
Peter Fayers
Ian Harvey
Andrew Briggs
John Norrie
Dean Fergusson
Ian Ford
Luke Vale
spellingShingle Jonathan Cook
Jennifer Hislop
Temitope Adewuyi
Kirsten Harrild
Douglas Altman
Craig Ramsay
Cynthia Fraser
Brian Buckley
Peter Fayers
Ian Harvey
Andrew Briggs
John Norrie
Dean Fergusson
Ian Ford
Luke Vale
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
Health Technology Assessment
author_facet Jonathan Cook
Jennifer Hislop
Temitope Adewuyi
Kirsten Harrild
Douglas Altman
Craig Ramsay
Cynthia Fraser
Brian Buckley
Peter Fayers
Ian Harvey
Andrew Briggs
John Norrie
Dean Fergusson
Ian Ford
Luke Vale
author_sort Jonathan Cook
title Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
title_short Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
title_full Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
title_fullStr Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
title_sort assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: delta (difference elicitation in trials) review
publisher NIHR Journals Library
series Health Technology Assessment
issn 1366-5278
publishDate 2014-01-01
url https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18280
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathancook assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT jenniferhislop assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT temitopeadewuyi assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT kirstenharrild assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT douglasaltman assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT craigramsay assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT cynthiafraser assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT brianbuckley assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT peterfayers assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT ianharvey assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT andrewbriggs assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT johnnorrie assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT deanfergusson assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT ianford assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
AT lukevale assessingmethodstospecifythetargetdifferenceforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdeltadifferenceelicitationintrialsreview
_version_ 1725604001303494656