Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Abstract Background Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. Methods A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the dete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine Marquez, Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson, Sabrina Jassemi, Jamie Park, Julia E. Moore, Caroline Blaine, Gertrude Bourdon, Mark Chignell, Moriah E. Ellen, Jacques Fortin, Ian D. Graham, Anne Hayes, Jemila Hamid, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Michael Hillmer, Bev Holmes, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Linda Hubert, Brian Hutton, Monika Kastner, John N. Lavis, Karen Michell, David Moher, Mathieu Ouimet, Laure Perrier, Andrea Proctor, Thomas Noseworthy, Victoria Schuckel, Sharlene Stayberg, Marcello Tonelli, Andrea C. Tricco, Sharon E. Straus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Implementation Science
Subjects:
Knowledge translation
Knowledge synthesis
Decision making
Policy makers
Health care managers
Evidence implementation
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Similar Items