TArgument is War...and War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation

• Main Author: Daniel H. Cohen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University of Windsor 1995-01-01
• Series: Informal Logic
• Subjects: metaphor; argument; philosophy; education
• Online Access: https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2406

The claim that argumentation has no proper role in either philosophy or education, and especially not in philosophical education, flies in the face of both conventional wisdom and traditional pedagogy. There is, however, something to be said for it because it is really only provocative against a certain philosophical backdrop. Our understanding of the concept "argument" is both reflected by and molded by the specific metaphor that argument-is-war, something with winners and losers, offensive and defensive moments, and an essentially adversarial structure. Such arguments may be suitable for teaching a philosophy, but not for teaching philosophy. Surely, education and philosophy do not need to be conceived as having an adversarial essence-if indeed they are thought to have any essence at all. Accordingly, philosophy and education need more pragmatic goals than even Pierce's idealized notion of truth as the end of inquiry, e.g., the simple furtherance of inquiry. For this, new metaphors for framing and understanding the concept of argumentation are needed, and some suggestions in that direction will be considered.