CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida

Summary Implementation of single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombineering in Pseudomonas putida has widened the range of genetic manipulations applicable to this biotechnologically relevant bacterium. Yet, the relatively low efficiency of the technology hampers identification of mutated clones lacking co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomás Aparicio, Víctor deLorenzo, Esteban Martínez‐García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-09-01
Series:Microbial Biotechnology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13453
id doaj-bc2fa6a5ddfb41dbbfc3573f7c9d0a6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc2fa6a5ddfb41dbbfc3573f7c9d0a6b2020-11-25T03:15:26ZengWileyMicrobial Biotechnology1751-79152019-09-011251076108910.1111/1751-7915.13453CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putidaTomás Aparicio0Víctor deLorenzo1Esteban Martínez‐García2Systems and Synthetic Biology Program Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB‐CSIC) Campus de Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid SpainSystems and Synthetic Biology Program Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB‐CSIC) Campus de Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid SpainSystems and Synthetic Biology Program Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB‐CSIC) Campus de Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid SpainSummary Implementation of single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombineering in Pseudomonas putida has widened the range of genetic manipulations applicable to this biotechnologically relevant bacterium. Yet, the relatively low efficiency of the technology hampers identification of mutated clones lacking conspicuous phenotypes. Fortunately, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 as a device for counterselection of wild‐type sequences helps to overcome this limitation. Merging ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR/Cas9 thus enables a suite of genomic edits with a straightforward approach: a CRISPR plasmid provides the spacer DNA sequence that directs the Cas9 nuclease ribonucleoprotein complex to cleave the genome at the wild‐type sequences that have not undergone the change entered by the mutagenic ssDNA oligonucleotide(s). This protocol describes a complete workflow of the method optimized for P. putida, although it could in principle be applicable to many other pseudomonads. As an example, we show the deletion of the edd gene that encodes one key enzyme that operates the EDEMP cycle for glucose metabolism in P. putida EM42. By combining two incompatible CRISPR plasmids with different antibiotic selection markers, we show that the procedure can be cycled to implement consecutive deletions in the same strain, e.g. deletion of the pyrF gene following that of the edd mutant. This approach adds to the wealth of genetic technologies available for P. putida and strengthens its status as a chassis of choice for a suite of biotechnological applications.https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13453
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomás Aparicio
Víctor deLorenzo
Esteban Martínez‐García
spellingShingle Tomás Aparicio
Víctor deLorenzo
Esteban Martínez‐García
CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
Microbial Biotechnology
author_facet Tomás Aparicio
Víctor deLorenzo
Esteban Martínez‐García
author_sort Tomás Aparicio
title CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
title_short CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
title_full CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
title_fullStr CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
title_full_unstemmed CRISPR/Cas9‐enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida
title_sort crispr/cas9‐enhanced ssdna recombineering for pseudomonas putida
publisher Wiley
series Microbial Biotechnology
issn 1751-7915
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Summary Implementation of single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombineering in Pseudomonas putida has widened the range of genetic manipulations applicable to this biotechnologically relevant bacterium. Yet, the relatively low efficiency of the technology hampers identification of mutated clones lacking conspicuous phenotypes. Fortunately, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 as a device for counterselection of wild‐type sequences helps to overcome this limitation. Merging ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR/Cas9 thus enables a suite of genomic edits with a straightforward approach: a CRISPR plasmid provides the spacer DNA sequence that directs the Cas9 nuclease ribonucleoprotein complex to cleave the genome at the wild‐type sequences that have not undergone the change entered by the mutagenic ssDNA oligonucleotide(s). This protocol describes a complete workflow of the method optimized for P. putida, although it could in principle be applicable to many other pseudomonads. As an example, we show the deletion of the edd gene that encodes one key enzyme that operates the EDEMP cycle for glucose metabolism in P. putida EM42. By combining two incompatible CRISPR plasmids with different antibiotic selection markers, we show that the procedure can be cycled to implement consecutive deletions in the same strain, e.g. deletion of the pyrF gene following that of the edd mutant. This approach adds to the wealth of genetic technologies available for P. putida and strengthens its status as a chassis of choice for a suite of biotechnological applications.
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13453
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasaparicio crisprcas9enhancedssdnarecombineeringforpseudomonasputida
AT victordelorenzo crisprcas9enhancedssdnarecombineeringforpseudomonasputida
AT estebanmartinezgarcia crisprcas9enhancedssdnarecombineeringforpseudomonasputida
_version_ 1724639423300108288