Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context

The current study aimed to examine how the use of metadiscourse markers may vary in the writing of language learners due to their language proficiency and learning context. To this end, 180 argumentative essays composed by native speakers of English (NSE), Japanese learners of English as a foreign l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Ampersand
Subjects:
EFL
ESL
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039020300126
id doaj-bfd222d7ea52447f95e3ed4b39c7a1ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfd222d7ea52447f95e3ed4b39c7a1ef2020-12-21T04:43:14ZengElsevierAmpersand2215-03902020-01-017100069Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning contextDina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs0Linguistics Department, College of Humanities, Prince Sultan University, P.O.Box No. 66833 Rafha Street, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi ArabiaThe current study aimed to examine how the use of metadiscourse markers may vary in the writing of language learners due to their language proficiency and learning context. To this end, 180 argumentative essays composed by native speakers of English (NSE), Japanese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) and Hong Kong learners of English as a second language (ESL) were obtained from the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE). The metadiscourse markers in the essays were identified and categorized according to Hyland's (2005) taxonomy of metadiscourse. The results showed a strong influence for the learning context with a number of statistically significant differences in the use of interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers across the three groups of participants. A limited influence for language proficiency was noted with learners of lower proficiency using significantly more transitions, frame markers and interactive markers than those of higher proficiency. This effect, however, disappeared when the interaction between language proficiency and learning context was considered. The results are interpreted in light of the existing literature and relevant linguistic, situational and cultural factors. Pedagogical implications and directions for future research are presented.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039020300126MetadiscourseVariationLanguage proficiencyEFLESLArgumentative essay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
spellingShingle Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
Ampersand
Metadiscourse
Variation
Language proficiency
EFL
ESL
Argumentative essay
author_facet Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
author_sort Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
title Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
title_short Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
title_full Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
title_fullStr Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
title_full_unstemmed Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context
title_sort variation of metadiscourse in l2 writing: focus on language proficiency and learning context
publisher Elsevier
series Ampersand
issn 2215-0390
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The current study aimed to examine how the use of metadiscourse markers may vary in the writing of language learners due to their language proficiency and learning context. To this end, 180 argumentative essays composed by native speakers of English (NSE), Japanese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) and Hong Kong learners of English as a second language (ESL) were obtained from the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE). The metadiscourse markers in the essays were identified and categorized according to Hyland's (2005) taxonomy of metadiscourse. The results showed a strong influence for the learning context with a number of statistically significant differences in the use of interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers across the three groups of participants. A limited influence for language proficiency was noted with learners of lower proficiency using significantly more transitions, frame markers and interactive markers than those of higher proficiency. This effect, however, disappeared when the interaction between language proficiency and learning context was considered. The results are interpreted in light of the existing literature and relevant linguistic, situational and cultural factors. Pedagogical implications and directions for future research are presented.
topic Metadiscourse
Variation
Language proficiency
EFL
ESL
Argumentative essay
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039020300126
work_keys_str_mv AT dinaabdelsalameldakhs variationofmetadiscourseinl2writingfocusonlanguageproficiencyandlearningcontext
_version_ 1724375866114310144