Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis

We use National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) data and a counterfactual approach to test the macro-level implications of cultural reproduction and cultural mobility theory. Our counterfactual analyses show that the observed socioeconomic gradient in children’s educational attainment in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mads Meier Jæger, Kristian Karlson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2018-12-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v5-33-775/
id doaj-bfef1b2fabc446f2be8f4d62938f0d89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfef1b2fabc446f2be8f4d62938f0d892020-11-25T00:34:55ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962018-12-0153377579510.15195/v5.a33Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual AnalysisMads Meier Jæger0Kristian Karlson1University of CopenhagenUniversity of CopenhagenWe use National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) data and a counterfactual approach to test the macro-level implications of cultural reproduction and cultural mobility theory. Our counterfactual analyses show that the observed socioeconomic gradient in children’s educational attainment in the NLSY79 data would be smaller if cultural capital was more equally distributed between children whose parents are of low socioeconomic status (SES) and those whose parents are of high SES. They also show that hypothetically increasing cultural capital among low-SES parents would lead to a larger reduction in the socioeconomic gradient in educational attainment than reducing it among high-SES parents. These findings are consistent with cultural mobility theory (which argues that low-SES children have a higher return to cultural capital than high-SES children) but not with cultural reproduction theory (which argues that low-SES children have a lower return to cultural capital). Our analysis contributes to existing research by demonstrating that the unequal distribution of cultural capital shapes educational inequality at the macro level.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v5-33-775/Cultural CapitalEducational InequalityCultural ReproductionCultural MobilityCounter-factual AnalysisBourdieu
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mads Meier Jæger
Kristian Karlson
spellingShingle Mads Meier Jæger
Kristian Karlson
Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
Sociological Science
Cultural Capital
Educational Inequality
Cultural Reproduction
Cultural Mobility
Counter-factual Analysis
Bourdieu
author_facet Mads Meier Jæger
Kristian Karlson
author_sort Mads Meier Jæger
title Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
title_short Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
title_full Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
title_fullStr Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Capital and Educational Inequality: A Counterfactual Analysis
title_sort cultural capital and educational inequality: a counterfactual analysis
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
2330-6696
publishDate 2018-12-01
description We use National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) data and a counterfactual approach to test the macro-level implications of cultural reproduction and cultural mobility theory. Our counterfactual analyses show that the observed socioeconomic gradient in children’s educational attainment in the NLSY79 data would be smaller if cultural capital was more equally distributed between children whose parents are of low socioeconomic status (SES) and those whose parents are of high SES. They also show that hypothetically increasing cultural capital among low-SES parents would lead to a larger reduction in the socioeconomic gradient in educational attainment than reducing it among high-SES parents. These findings are consistent with cultural mobility theory (which argues that low-SES children have a higher return to cultural capital than high-SES children) but not with cultural reproduction theory (which argues that low-SES children have a lower return to cultural capital). Our analysis contributes to existing research by demonstrating that the unequal distribution of cultural capital shapes educational inequality at the macro level.
topic Cultural Capital
Educational Inequality
Cultural Reproduction
Cultural Mobility
Counter-factual Analysis
Bourdieu
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v5-33-775/
work_keys_str_mv AT madsmeierjæger culturalcapitalandeducationalinequalityacounterfactualanalysis
AT kristiankarlson culturalcapitalandeducationalinequalityacounterfactualanalysis
_version_ 1725311464289337344