The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers

Admitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical asse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez, María José Martínez Segura, Mari Paz García Sanz, Francisco Alberto García Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado 2010-10-01
Series:Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdf
id doaj-c1a0f8ae220e42e78e4b77755fe9ace4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1a0f8ae220e42e78e4b77755fe9ace42020-11-24T21:38:56ZengAsociación Universitaria de Formación del ProfesoradoRevista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado0213-86461575-09652010-10-01133141154The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education TeachersJavier J. Maquilón SánchezMaría José Martínez SeguraMari Paz García SanzFrancisco Alberto García SánchezAdmitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical assessment of learning, teaching and programs, and the level of importance that they give to this evaluation. In this study we analyzed the differences found in variables as gender, type of the school (specific/ordinary), speciality (therapeutic pedagogy/audition and language), administrative situation (official/supply teacher) and years of experience. In general, they gave more importance to evaluation than their real practice shows, and it concerned more the evaluation of learning and less that of teaching. The comparison between variables is allowed to make an x-ray about commitment to practical systematized assessment. http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdfLearning evaluationTeaching evaluationProgram evaluationSpecial education needsSpecial education teachers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez
María José Martínez Segura
Mari Paz García Sanz
Francisco Alberto García Sánchez
spellingShingle Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez
María José Martínez Segura
Mari Paz García Sanz
Francisco Alberto García Sánchez
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado
Learning evaluation
Teaching evaluation
Program evaluation
Special education needs
Special education teachers
author_facet Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez
María José Martínez Segura
Mari Paz García Sanz
Francisco Alberto García Sánchez
author_sort Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez
title The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
title_short The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
title_full The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
title_fullStr The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
title_full_unstemmed The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
title_sort training in educational assessment practices of special education teachers
publisher Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado
series Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado
issn 0213-8646
1575-0965
publishDate 2010-10-01
description Admitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical assessment of learning, teaching and programs, and the level of importance that they give to this evaluation. In this study we analyzed the differences found in variables as gender, type of the school (specific/ordinary), speciality (therapeutic pedagogy/audition and language), administrative situation (official/supply teacher) and years of experience. In general, they gave more importance to evaluation than their real practice shows, and it concerned more the evaluation of learning and less that of teaching. The comparison between variables is allowed to make an x-ray about commitment to practical systematized assessment.
topic Learning evaluation
Teaching evaluation
Program evaluation
Special education needs
Special education teachers
url http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT javierjmaquilonsanchez thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT mariajosemartinezsegura thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT maripazgarciasanz thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT franciscoalbertogarciasanchez thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT javierjmaquilonsanchez trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT mariajosemartinezsegura trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT maripazgarciasanz trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
AT franciscoalbertogarciasanchez trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers
_version_ 1725933660028272640