The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers
Admitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical asse...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado
2010-10-01
|
Series: | Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdf |
id |
doaj-c1a0f8ae220e42e78e4b77755fe9ace4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c1a0f8ae220e42e78e4b77755fe9ace42020-11-24T21:38:56ZengAsociación Universitaria de Formación del ProfesoradoRevista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado0213-86461575-09652010-10-01133141154The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education TeachersJavier J. Maquilón SánchezMaría José Martínez SeguraMari Paz García SanzFrancisco Alberto García SánchezAdmitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical assessment of learning, teaching and programs, and the level of importance that they give to this evaluation. In this study we analyzed the differences found in variables as gender, type of the school (specific/ordinary), speciality (therapeutic pedagogy/audition and language), administrative situation (official/supply teacher) and years of experience. In general, they gave more importance to evaluation than their real practice shows, and it concerned more the evaluation of learning and less that of teaching. The comparison between variables is allowed to make an x-ray about commitment to practical systematized assessment. http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdfLearning evaluationTeaching evaluationProgram evaluationSpecial education needsSpecial education teachers |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez María José Martínez Segura Mari Paz García Sanz Francisco Alberto García Sánchez |
spellingShingle |
Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez María José Martínez Segura Mari Paz García Sanz Francisco Alberto García Sánchez The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado Learning evaluation Teaching evaluation Program evaluation Special education needs Special education teachers |
author_facet |
Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez María José Martínez Segura Mari Paz García Sanz Francisco Alberto García Sánchez |
author_sort |
Javier J. Maquilón Sánchez |
title |
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers |
title_short |
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers |
title_full |
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers |
title_fullStr |
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Training in Educational Assessment practices of Special Education Teachers |
title_sort |
training in educational assessment practices of special education teachers |
publisher |
Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado |
series |
Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado |
issn |
0213-8646 1575-0965 |
publishDate |
2010-10-01 |
description |
Admitting the importance of evaluation in the culture of quality, and especially in the field of education, 233 teachers have taken part in this research. They work to help children with especial educational needs, in Murcia (Spain).We asked them about their level of real execution of practical assessment of learning, teaching and programs, and the level of importance that they give to this evaluation. In this study we analyzed the differences found in variables as gender, type of the school (specific/ordinary), speciality (therapeutic pedagogy/audition and language), administrative situation (official/supply teacher) and years of experience. In general, they gave more importance to evaluation than their real practice shows, and it concerned more the evaluation of learning and less that of teaching. The comparison between variables is allowed to make an x-ray about commitment to practical systematized assessment. |
topic |
Learning evaluation Teaching evaluation Program evaluation Special education needs Special education teachers |
url |
http://www.aufop.com/aufop/uploaded_files/articulos/1285862950.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT javierjmaquilonsanchez thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT mariajosemartinezsegura thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT maripazgarciasanz thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT franciscoalbertogarciasanchez thetrainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT javierjmaquilonsanchez trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT mariajosemartinezsegura trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT maripazgarciasanz trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers AT franciscoalbertogarciasanchez trainingineducationalassessmentpracticesofspecialeducationteachers |
_version_ |
1725933660028272640 |