De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire

Billy Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julie Michot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Française d'Etudes Américaines 2019-09-01
Series:Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
Subjects:
One
Two
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864
id doaj-c2ab26fc00b842b6ae9c7f13bbec04b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2ab26fc00b842b6ae9c7f13bbec04b02021-09-02T15:23:39ZengAssociation Française d'Etudes AméricainesTransatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines1765-27662019-09-01110.4000/transatlantica.11864De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaireJulie MichotBilly Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle ideological stances all the more unexpected because neither Wilder nor Hitchcock were known for making their political views public. The aim of this essay is to study the devices used by both whether in their script or filming, to illustrate their vision of capitalism and communism. The two directors did criticize the revolutionary heritage—but in the midst of the Cold War, they also took an unsupportive attitude towards the proposed model of their adopted country.http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864Alfred HitchcockBilly WilderTopazOneTwoThree
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julie Michot
spellingShingle Julie Michot
De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
Alfred Hitchcock
Billy Wilder
Topaz
One
Two
Three
author_facet Julie Michot
author_sort Julie Michot
title De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_short De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_full De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_fullStr De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_full_unstemmed De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_sort de la porte de brandebourg à la havane : wilder, hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
publisher Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
series Transatlantica : Revue d'Études Américaines
issn 1765-2766
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Billy Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle ideological stances all the more unexpected because neither Wilder nor Hitchcock were known for making their political views public. The aim of this essay is to study the devices used by both whether in their script or filming, to illustrate their vision of capitalism and communism. The two directors did criticize the revolutionary heritage—but in the midst of the Cold War, they also took an unsupportive attitude towards the proposed model of their adopted country.
topic Alfred Hitchcock
Billy Wilder
Topaz
One
Two
Three
url http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864
work_keys_str_mv AT juliemichot delaportedebrandebourgalahavanewilderhitchcocketlheritagerevolutionnaire
_version_ 1721173723461976064