Low Response Rate and Other Factors Render Academic Health Science Library System Study Ungeneralizable. A Review of: Folb, B. L., Wessel, C. B., & Czechowski, L. J. (2011). Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: The Health Sciences Library System e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(3), 218-228. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.009

Low Response Rate and Other Factors Render Academic Health Science Library System Study Ungeneralizable. A Review of: Folb, B. L., Wessel, C. B., & Czechowski, L. J. (2011). Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: The Health Sciences Library System e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(3), 218-228. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.009

<b>Objective</b> – To determine the factors, barriersand facilitators, preference, and intended useof e-book compared to print book usage by allpatrons in a health science library system,which serves a university with health sciencedegree programs and a hospital system.<br><b>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria Melssen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2012-06-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Online Access:http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/16355/14033

Internet

http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/16355/14033

Similar Items