Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

BackgroundIt is still uncertain whether coronary bifurcations with lesions involving a large side branch (SB) should be treated by stenting the main vessel and provisional stenting of the SB (simple) or by routine two-stent techniques (complex). We aimed to compare clinical outcome after treatment o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thor Trovik, Juha Hartikainen, Evald Høj Christiansen, Niels Ramsing Holm, Ole Fröbert, Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Michael Maeng, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Jens Aarøe, Thomas Engstrøm, Indulis Kumsars, Matti Niemelä, Andrejs Erglis, Kari Kervinen, Andis Dombrovskis, Vytautas Abraitis, Aleksandras Kibarskis, Gustavs Latkovskis, Dace Sondore, Inga Narbute, Markku Eskola, Hannu Romppanen, Mika Laine, Mikko Pietila, Pål Gunnes, Lasse Hebsgaard, Fredrik Calais, Jan Ravkilde, Terje K Steigen, Leif Thuesen, Jens F Lassen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:Open Heart
Online Access:https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000947.full

Internet

https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000947.full

Similar Items