Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey

The effects of honey type (X1), liquefaction temperature (X2) and timing (X3), prefiltering (X4), sample weight (X5), dilution volume (X6), Carrez I (X7) and Carrez II volume (X8), final filtering (X9), polarimeter tube length (X10) and reading system (X11) on the determination of the specific optic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salud Serrano, Inmaculada Rodríguez, Rosa Moreno, Francisco Rincón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:CyTA - Journal of Food
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2019.1620338
id doaj-cffad2f6070b4d4ea1a15e83c615d520
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cffad2f6070b4d4ea1a15e83c615d5202020-11-25T02:09:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCyTA - Journal of Food1947-63371947-63452019-01-0117157458010.1080/19476337.2019.16203381620338Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honeySalud Serrano0Inmaculada Rodríguez1Rosa Moreno2Francisco Rincón3University of CórdobaUniversity of CórdobaUniversity of CórdobaUniversity of CórdobaThe effects of honey type (X1), liquefaction temperature (X2) and timing (X3), prefiltering (X4), sample weight (X5), dilution volume (X6), Carrez I (X7) and Carrez II volume (X8), final filtering (X9), polarimeter tube length (X10) and reading system (X11) on the determination of the specific optical rotation (SOR, R1) determination were investigated using the fractional experimental design $$2_{IV}^{11 - 6}$$. X1 and X11 showed strong influence as key factors. Although X1 differentiate blossom from honeydew honey, X11 can mistake the determination of this parameter and thus the classification of honeys. This study sets an uncertain interval (−5º to +5º) of overlapping between the SOR of blossom and honeydew honeys. Automatic polarimeter system showed lower variability than manual. Factors affecting pH (R2) and electrical conductivity (EC, R3) of working solutions were identified as X4, X6, X8, X11; and X4, X7, X8, X11, respectively.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2019.1620338specific optical rotationblossom honeyhoneydew honeyfractional experimental designbotanical originapparent critical factors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Salud Serrano
Inmaculada Rodríguez
Rosa Moreno
Francisco Rincón
spellingShingle Salud Serrano
Inmaculada Rodríguez
Rosa Moreno
Francisco Rincón
Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
CyTA - Journal of Food
specific optical rotation
blossom honey
honeydew honey
fractional experimental design
botanical origin
apparent critical factors
author_facet Salud Serrano
Inmaculada Rodríguez
Rosa Moreno
Francisco Rincón
author_sort Salud Serrano
title Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
title_short Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
title_full Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
title_fullStr Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
title_full_unstemmed Detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
title_sort detection of key factors affecting specific optical rotation determination in honey
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series CyTA - Journal of Food
issn 1947-6337
1947-6345
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The effects of honey type (X1), liquefaction temperature (X2) and timing (X3), prefiltering (X4), sample weight (X5), dilution volume (X6), Carrez I (X7) and Carrez II volume (X8), final filtering (X9), polarimeter tube length (X10) and reading system (X11) on the determination of the specific optical rotation (SOR, R1) determination were investigated using the fractional experimental design $$2_{IV}^{11 - 6}$$. X1 and X11 showed strong influence as key factors. Although X1 differentiate blossom from honeydew honey, X11 can mistake the determination of this parameter and thus the classification of honeys. This study sets an uncertain interval (−5º to +5º) of overlapping between the SOR of blossom and honeydew honeys. Automatic polarimeter system showed lower variability than manual. Factors affecting pH (R2) and electrical conductivity (EC, R3) of working solutions were identified as X4, X6, X8, X11; and X4, X7, X8, X11, respectively.
topic specific optical rotation
blossom honey
honeydew honey
fractional experimental design
botanical origin
apparent critical factors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2019.1620338
work_keys_str_mv AT saludserrano detectionofkeyfactorsaffectingspecificopticalrotationdeterminationinhoney
AT inmaculadarodriguez detectionofkeyfactorsaffectingspecificopticalrotationdeterminationinhoney
AT rosamoreno detectionofkeyfactorsaffectingspecificopticalrotationdeterminationinhoney
AT franciscorincon detectionofkeyfactorsaffectingspecificopticalrotationdeterminationinhoney
_version_ 1724923221664333824