Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Abstract Background The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting in RCT reports by early career researchers (ECRs) using an online CONSORT-based peer-review...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, David Moher, David Schriger, Sally Hopewell, Daniel Shanahan, Sabina Alam, Gabriel Baron, Jean-Philippe Regnaux, Perrine Crequit, Valeria Martinez, Carolina Riveros, Laurence Le Cleach, Alessandro Recchioni, Douglas G. Altman, Isabelle Boutron
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Peer reviewers
Randomized controlled trials
Reporting
CONSORT statement
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0

Similar Items