“Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit

Abstract Background The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigrid A. Troelstra, Anton E. Kunst, Janneke Harting
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y
id doaj-d8fce5567d374527b90c8046361b2fae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8fce5567d374527b90c8046361b2fae2020-11-25T02:09:21ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-05-0119111010.1186/s12889-019-6833-y“Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quitSigrid A. Troelstra0Anton E. Kunst1Janneke Harting2Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAbstract Background The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, Responses, Impulses, Motives and Evaluations) theory. Although Stoptober was found to yield impressive 28-day quit rates, relapse rates remained substantial. Therefore, we examined how Stoptober supported smokers in their attempt to quit and how the campaign’s effectiveness could be strengthened. Methods In 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 Stoptober participants in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed thematically. Results Respondents explained how social contagion-based components had familiarized them with Stoptober, motivated them to participate, and created a pro-smoking cessation social norm. Setting SMART goals was reported as “fooling yourself”, since it distracted respondents from their goal of quitting for good and helped them perceive that temporary abstinence was achievable. Respondents also illustrated the usefulness of PRIME theory. They typically used an individual selection of available supports that varied over time. To achieve long-term abstinence, respondents expressed the need for additional social network support and interactive, personalized and professional support during and after the campaign. Conclusions Stoptober supports smokers in their attempts to quit and generally according to the campaign’s theoretical principles. Added to available evidence, this finding supports the continuation and wider implementation of Stoptober, while connecting the campaign to social networks and regular smoking-cessation services to help improve long-term abstinence rates.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-ySmoking cessationInterventionStoptoberQualitative researchTemporary abstinence campaigns
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sigrid A. Troelstra
Anton E. Kunst
Janneke Harting
spellingShingle Sigrid A. Troelstra
Anton E. Kunst
Janneke Harting
“Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
BMC Public Health
Smoking cessation
Intervention
Stoptober
Qualitative research
Temporary abstinence campaigns
author_facet Sigrid A. Troelstra
Anton E. Kunst
Janneke Harting
author_sort Sigrid A. Troelstra
title “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_short “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_full “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_fullStr “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_full_unstemmed “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_sort “like you are fooling yourself”: how the “stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports dutch smokers attempting to quit
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, Responses, Impulses, Motives and Evaluations) theory. Although Stoptober was found to yield impressive 28-day quit rates, relapse rates remained substantial. Therefore, we examined how Stoptober supported smokers in their attempt to quit and how the campaign’s effectiveness could be strengthened. Methods In 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 Stoptober participants in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed thematically. Results Respondents explained how social contagion-based components had familiarized them with Stoptober, motivated them to participate, and created a pro-smoking cessation social norm. Setting SMART goals was reported as “fooling yourself”, since it distracted respondents from their goal of quitting for good and helped them perceive that temporary abstinence was achievable. Respondents also illustrated the usefulness of PRIME theory. They typically used an individual selection of available supports that varied over time. To achieve long-term abstinence, respondents expressed the need for additional social network support and interactive, personalized and professional support during and after the campaign. Conclusions Stoptober supports smokers in their attempts to quit and generally according to the campaign’s theoretical principles. Added to available evidence, this finding supports the continuation and wider implementation of Stoptober, while connecting the campaign to social networks and regular smoking-cessation services to help improve long-term abstinence rates.
topic Smoking cessation
Intervention
Stoptober
Qualitative research
Temporary abstinence campaigns
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sigridatroelstra likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit
AT antonekunst likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit
AT jannekeharting likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit
_version_ 1724924446391664640