Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey

Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey

Lara A Kahale,1 Assem M Khamis,2 Batoul Diab,1 Yaping Chang,3 Luciane Cruz Lopes,4 Arnav Agarwal,3,5 Ling Li,6 Reem A Mustafa,3,7 Serge Koujanian,8 Reem Waziry,9 Jason W Busse,3,10– 12 Abeer Dakik,1 Lotty Hooft,13 Gordon H Guyatt,3,14 Rob JPM Scholten,13 Elie A Akl1,3 1Clinical Research In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kahale LA, Khamis AM, Diab B, Chang Y, Lopes LC, Agarwal A, Li L, Mustafa RA, Koujanian S, Waziry R, Busse JW, Dakik A, Hooft L, Guyatt GH, Scholten RJPM, Akl EA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-05-01
Series:Clinical Epidemiology
Subjects:
missing data
assumption
randomized controlled trial
systematic review
meta-analysis
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/meta-analyses-proved-inconsistent-in-how-missing-data-were-handled-acr-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP

Internet

https://www.dovepress.com/meta-analyses-proved-inconsistent-in-how-missing-data-were-handled-acr-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP

Similar Items