Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing

Abstract Background Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura E. MacConaill, Robert T. Burns, Anwesha Nag, Haley A. Coleman, Michael K. Slevin, Kristina Giorda, Madelyn Light, Kevin Lai, Mirna Jarosz, Matthew S. McNeill, Matthew D. Ducar, Matthew Meyerson, Aaron R. Thorner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5
id doaj-e5c8f64160a944ba9d2804d883e83001
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5c8f64160a944ba9d2804d883e830012020-11-24T23:39:04ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642018-01-0119111010.1186/s12864-017-4428-5Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencingLaura E. MacConaill0Robert T. Burns1Anwesha Nag2Haley A. Coleman3Michael K. Slevin4Kristina Giorda5Madelyn Light6Kevin Lai7Mirna Jarosz8Matthew S. McNeill9Matthew D. Ducar10Matthew Meyerson11Aaron R. Thorner12Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCIIntegrated DNA Technologies, Inc.Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCICenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, DFCIAbstract Background Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. Results Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. Conclusions For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5Next generation sequencingMassively parallel sequencingAdapterIndexBarcode cross-talkIllumina
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura E. MacConaill
Robert T. Burns
Anwesha Nag
Haley A. Coleman
Michael K. Slevin
Kristina Giorda
Madelyn Light
Kevin Lai
Mirna Jarosz
Matthew S. McNeill
Matthew D. Ducar
Matthew Meyerson
Aaron R. Thorner
spellingShingle Laura E. MacConaill
Robert T. Burns
Anwesha Nag
Haley A. Coleman
Michael K. Slevin
Kristina Giorda
Madelyn Light
Kevin Lai
Mirna Jarosz
Matthew S. McNeill
Matthew D. Ducar
Matthew Meyerson
Aaron R. Thorner
Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
BMC Genomics
Next generation sequencing
Massively parallel sequencing
Adapter
Index
Barcode cross-talk
Illumina
author_facet Laura E. MacConaill
Robert T. Burns
Anwesha Nag
Haley A. Coleman
Michael K. Slevin
Kristina Giorda
Madelyn Light
Kevin Lai
Mirna Jarosz
Matthew S. McNeill
Matthew D. Ducar
Matthew Meyerson
Aaron R. Thorner
author_sort Laura E. MacConaill
title Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_short Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_full Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_fullStr Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_sort unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with umis effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract Background Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. Results Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. Conclusions For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications.
topic Next generation sequencing
Massively parallel sequencing
Adapter
Index
Barcode cross-talk
Illumina
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraemacconaill uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT roberttburns uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT anweshanag uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT haleyacoleman uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT michaelkslevin uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT kristinagiorda uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT madelynlight uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT kevinlai uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT mirnajarosz uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT matthewsmcneill uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT matthewdducar uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT matthewmeyerson uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT aaronrthorner uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
_version_ 1725514711768760320