Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences

Abstract Background By participating in priority-setting activities in research, patients and members of the public help ensure that important questions are incorporated into future research agendas. Surveys, focus groups, and online crowdsourcing are increasingly used to obtain input, yet little is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danielle C. Lavallee, Sarah O. Lawrence, Andrew L. Avins, David R. Nerenz, Todd C. Edwards, Donald L. Patrick, Zoya Bauer, Anjali R. Truitt, Sarah E. Monsell, Mary R. Scott, Jeffrey G. Jarvik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:Research Involvement and Engagement
Subjects:
Patient involvement
Patient engagement
Patient-centered outcomes research
Qualitative research
Research priorities
Crowd-voting
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-020-00196-4

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-020-00196-4

Similar Items