Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives

Drawing on the recent research ‘Dominant and demotic school culture: analysis of tensions fields’ this paper analyses found artifacts in 6 different Lithuanian secondary schools. The visual data was collected by making images of places and artifacts which were mentioned during the walks in the schoo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sandra Kaire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Foundation Pro Scientia Publica 2016-09-01
Series:Journal of Education Culture and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ojs.jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/10.15503.jecs20162.131.149/pdf
id doaj-ea545decc5b4475fa3077dbf6cdda12a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea545decc5b4475fa3077dbf6cdda12a2020-11-25T02:54:39ZengFoundation Pro Scientia PublicaJournal of Education Culture and Society2081-16402081-16402016-09-012016213114910.15503/jecs20162.131.149Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectivesSandra Kaire0Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 9/1, LT-01513, Vilnius, LithuaniaDrawing on the recent research ‘Dominant and demotic school culture: analysis of tensions fields’ this paper analyses found artifacts in 6 different Lithuanian secondary schools. The visual data was collected by making images of places and artifacts which were mentioned during the walks in the school territory with one teacher and one pupil afterwards. The analysis of images focuses particularly on two aspects: a) which artifacts are significant for teachers and pupils in the schools? b) What do these artifacts mean for teachers and pupils? Therefore, the analysis is based on comparing walks among teachers and pupils in all schools. The analysis shows obvious differences on re/presented artifacts among teachers and pupils. The teachers emphasized and showed those artifacts which on one way or another represent their schools’ achievements, like pupils’ sport achievements, pupils’ artworks, and honored pupils’ displays, and were related with aspects of pride. The paper argues the possible reasons for the importance of pride in schools. Meanwhile, pupils were highlighting spaces they like to gather around during non-learning time. Pupils appreciate less visible places because it is possible to have some privacy there. As analysis shows, different sitting artifacts (chairs, sofas, beanbags) play an important role for creating such private pupils’ ‘oases’. On the other hand, such artifacts, as pupils’ artworks, information displays, and sport achievements, seem to be meaningful for pupils if they were contributing in the creation process or were mentioned in these artifacts.http://www.ojs.jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/10.15503.jecs20162.131.149/pdfschool cultureschool artifactsteacherpupilpride and privacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandra Kaire
spellingShingle Sandra Kaire
Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
Journal of Education Culture and Society
school culture
school artifacts
teacher
pupil
pride and privacy
author_facet Sandra Kaire
author_sort Sandra Kaire
title Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
title_short Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
title_full Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
title_fullStr Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
title_sort significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives
publisher Foundation Pro Scientia Publica
series Journal of Education Culture and Society
issn 2081-1640
2081-1640
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Drawing on the recent research ‘Dominant and demotic school culture: analysis of tensions fields’ this paper analyses found artifacts in 6 different Lithuanian secondary schools. The visual data was collected by making images of places and artifacts which were mentioned during the walks in the school territory with one teacher and one pupil afterwards. The analysis of images focuses particularly on two aspects: a) which artifacts are significant for teachers and pupils in the schools? b) What do these artifacts mean for teachers and pupils? Therefore, the analysis is based on comparing walks among teachers and pupils in all schools. The analysis shows obvious differences on re/presented artifacts among teachers and pupils. The teachers emphasized and showed those artifacts which on one way or another represent their schools’ achievements, like pupils’ sport achievements, pupils’ artworks, and honored pupils’ displays, and were related with aspects of pride. The paper argues the possible reasons for the importance of pride in schools. Meanwhile, pupils were highlighting spaces they like to gather around during non-learning time. Pupils appreciate less visible places because it is possible to have some privacy there. As analysis shows, different sitting artifacts (chairs, sofas, beanbags) play an important role for creating such private pupils’ ‘oases’. On the other hand, such artifacts, as pupils’ artworks, information displays, and sport achievements, seem to be meaningful for pupils if they were contributing in the creation process or were mentioned in these artifacts.
topic school culture
school artifacts
teacher
pupil
pride and privacy
url http://www.ojs.jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/10.15503.jecs20162.131.149/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrakaire significantartifactsinschoolsteacherandpupilperspectives
_version_ 1724719667663077376