Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
One of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
FRUCT
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf
|
id |
doaj-ee0607b72a32450fb31695b0a3d3dec2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ee0607b72a32450fb31695b0a3d3dec22020-11-24T22:52:40ZengFRUCTProceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT2305-72542343-07372018-05-014262210110610.23919/FRUCT.2018.8468263Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM AlgorithmsKirill Krinkin0Anton Filatov1Artyom Filatov2Artur Huletski3Dmitriy Kartashov4Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaSaint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaSaint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaThe Academic University, St. Petersburg, RussiaThe Academic University, St. Petersburg, RussiaOne of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try to solve the problem, the universal one has not been proposed yet [1]. A laser rangefinder is a widespread sensor for mobile platforms and it was decided to evaluate actual 2D laser scan based SLAM algorithms on real world indoor environments. The following algorithms were considered: Google Cartographer [2], GMapping [3], tinySLAM [4]. According to their evaluation, Cartographer and GMapping are more accurate than tinySLAM and Cartographer is the most robust of the algorithms.https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf Indoor SLAMlaser SLAMgmappingcartographerperformance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kirill Krinkin Anton Filatov Artyom Filatov Artur Huletski Dmitriy Kartashov |
spellingShingle |
Kirill Krinkin Anton Filatov Artyom Filatov Artur Huletski Dmitriy Kartashov Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT Indoor SLAM laser SLAM gmapping cartographer performance |
author_facet |
Kirill Krinkin Anton Filatov Artyom Filatov Artur Huletski Dmitriy Kartashov |
author_sort |
Kirill Krinkin |
title |
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms |
title_short |
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms |
title_full |
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms |
title_sort |
evaluation of modern laser based indoor slam algorithms |
publisher |
FRUCT |
series |
Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT |
issn |
2305-7254 2343-0737 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
One of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try to solve the problem, the universal one has not been proposed yet [1]. A laser rangefinder is a widespread sensor for mobile platforms and it was decided to evaluate actual 2D laser scan based SLAM algorithms on real world indoor environments. The following algorithms were considered: Google Cartographer [2], GMapping [3], tinySLAM [4]. According to their evaluation, Cartographer and GMapping are more accurate than tinySLAM and Cartographer is the most robust of the algorithms. |
topic |
Indoor SLAM laser SLAM gmapping cartographer performance |
url |
https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kirillkrinkin evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms AT antonfilatov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms AT artyomfilatov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms AT arturhuletski evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms AT dmitriykartashov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms |
_version_ |
1725665137178705920 |