Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms

One of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirill Krinkin, Anton Filatov, Artyom Filatov, Artur Huletski, Dmitriy Kartashov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FRUCT 2018-05-01
Series:Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf
id doaj-ee0607b72a32450fb31695b0a3d3dec2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee0607b72a32450fb31695b0a3d3dec22020-11-24T22:52:40ZengFRUCTProceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT2305-72542343-07372018-05-014262210110610.23919/FRUCT.2018.8468263Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM AlgorithmsKirill Krinkin0Anton Filatov1Artyom Filatov2Artur Huletski3Dmitriy Kartashov4Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaSaint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaSaint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, RussiaThe Academic University, St. Petersburg, RussiaThe Academic University, St. Petersburg, RussiaOne of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try to solve the problem, the universal one has not been proposed yet [1]. A laser rangefinder is a widespread sensor for mobile platforms and it was decided to evaluate actual 2D laser scan based SLAM algorithms on real world indoor environments. The following algorithms were considered: Google Cartographer [2], GMapping [3], tinySLAM [4]. According to their evaluation, Cartographer and GMapping are more accurate than tinySLAM and Cartographer is the most robust of the algorithms.https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf Indoor SLAMlaser SLAMgmappingcartographerperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirill Krinkin
Anton Filatov
Artyom Filatov
Artur Huletski
Dmitriy Kartashov
spellingShingle Kirill Krinkin
Anton Filatov
Artyom Filatov
Artur Huletski
Dmitriy Kartashov
Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
Indoor SLAM
laser SLAM
gmapping
cartographer
performance
author_facet Kirill Krinkin
Anton Filatov
Artyom Filatov
Artur Huletski
Dmitriy Kartashov
author_sort Kirill Krinkin
title Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
title_short Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
title_full Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
title_fullStr Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Modern Laser Based Indoor SLAM Algorithms
title_sort evaluation of modern laser based indoor slam algorithms
publisher FRUCT
series Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
issn 2305-7254
2343-0737
publishDate 2018-05-01
description One of the key issues that prevents creation of a truly autonomous mobile robot is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem. A solution is supposed to estimate a robot pose and to build a map of an unknown environment simultaneously. Despite existence of different algorithms that try to solve the problem, the universal one has not been proposed yet [1]. A laser rangefinder is a widespread sensor for mobile platforms and it was decided to evaluate actual 2D laser scan based SLAM algorithms on real world indoor environments. The following algorithms were considered: Google Cartographer [2], GMapping [3], tinySLAM [4]. According to their evaluation, Cartographer and GMapping are more accurate than tinySLAM and Cartographer is the most robust of the algorithms.
topic Indoor SLAM
laser SLAM
gmapping
cartographer
performance
url https://fruct.org/publications/fruct22/files/Kri2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kirillkrinkin evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms
AT antonfilatov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms
AT artyomfilatov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms
AT arturhuletski evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms
AT dmitriykartashov evaluationofmodernlaserbasedindoorslamalgorithms
_version_ 1725665137178705920