Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement

We report a study that developed algorithms to measure the dimension and uncertainty range of free space inside the knee joint for the purpose of minimally invasive surgery. During knee arthroscopy, the patient's leg position is continuously adjusted to create the space for surgical instruments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Strydom, Ross Crawford, Jonathan Roberts, Anjali Jaiprakash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2019-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8902057/
id doaj-f1c3e342cd8f4843949c6fcbafa2c266
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1c3e342cd8f4843949c6fcbafa2c2662021-03-30T00:54:13ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-01716838216839410.1109/ACCESS.2019.29534718902057Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint MeasurementMario Strydom0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-2324Ross Crawford1Jonathan Roberts2Anjali Jaiprakash3Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaScience and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaScience and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaScience and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaWe report a study that developed algorithms to measure the dimension and uncertainty range of free space inside the knee joint for the purpose of minimally invasive surgery. During knee arthroscopy, the patient's leg position is continuously adjusted to create the space for surgical instruments inside the joint. Surgeons 'feel' the force they apply to the leg and estimate the joint space from a 2D video. In many cases, they overestimate the instrument gap, resulting in damaging to the knee joint by pushing instruments through a gap that is too small. We used cadaveric experiments to inform the noise induced by the sensors and image processing steps, to derive an error point-cloud in a simulated environment. From the point-cloud, we calculate the instrument gap range inside the knee joint. For a selected surgical instrument gap size, the measurement algorithm is accurate to less than a millimetre. However, measurement errors introduce an uncertainty of 14%. The performance of our algorithms demonstrates the use of a single-lens arthroscope to measure the instrument gap to provide feedback to a surgeon or enable control of a robotic leg manipulator.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8902057/Computer visionjoint motion stereoimage segmentationoptical trackingerror analysismeasurement uncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario Strydom
Ross Crawford
Jonathan Roberts
Anjali Jaiprakash
spellingShingle Mario Strydom
Ross Crawford
Jonathan Roberts
Anjali Jaiprakash
Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
IEEE Access
Computer vision
joint motion stereo
image segmentation
optical tracking
error analysis
measurement uncertainty
author_facet Mario Strydom
Ross Crawford
Jonathan Roberts
Anjali Jaiprakash
author_sort Mario Strydom
title Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
title_short Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
title_full Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
title_fullStr Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Arthroscopy: The Uncertainty in Internal Knee Joint Measurement
title_sort robotic arthroscopy: the uncertainty in internal knee joint measurement
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2019-01-01
description We report a study that developed algorithms to measure the dimension and uncertainty range of free space inside the knee joint for the purpose of minimally invasive surgery. During knee arthroscopy, the patient's leg position is continuously adjusted to create the space for surgical instruments inside the joint. Surgeons 'feel' the force they apply to the leg and estimate the joint space from a 2D video. In many cases, they overestimate the instrument gap, resulting in damaging to the knee joint by pushing instruments through a gap that is too small. We used cadaveric experiments to inform the noise induced by the sensors and image processing steps, to derive an error point-cloud in a simulated environment. From the point-cloud, we calculate the instrument gap range inside the knee joint. For a selected surgical instrument gap size, the measurement algorithm is accurate to less than a millimetre. However, measurement errors introduce an uncertainty of 14%. The performance of our algorithms demonstrates the use of a single-lens arthroscope to measure the instrument gap to provide feedback to a surgeon or enable control of a robotic leg manipulator.
topic Computer vision
joint motion stereo
image segmentation
optical tracking
error analysis
measurement uncertainty
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8902057/
work_keys_str_mv AT mariostrydom roboticarthroscopytheuncertaintyininternalkneejointmeasurement
AT rosscrawford roboticarthroscopytheuncertaintyininternalkneejointmeasurement
AT jonathanroberts roboticarthroscopytheuncertaintyininternalkneejointmeasurement
AT anjalijaiprakash roboticarthroscopytheuncertaintyininternalkneejointmeasurement
_version_ 1724187759048916992