The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone

The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Estela Altoé Lemos, Leonardo Carvalho Caldas, Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo, André Soares Leopoldo, Lucas Guimarães Ferreira, Wellington Lunz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alicante 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zone
id doaj-f1de07f9c5f94deebeafa71a69117434
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1de07f9c5f94deebeafa71a691174342020-11-25T00:26:18ZengUniversity of AlicanteJournal of Human Sport and Exercise1988-52022017-09-0112359360610.14198/jhse.2017.123.049638The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zoneEstela Altoé Lemos0Leonardo Carvalho Caldas1Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo2André Soares Leopoldo3Lucas Guimarães Ferreira4Wellington Lunz5Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM test in seven exercises on strength machines, and the load was calculated to reach 50%, 70% and 90% of the 1-RM. Over the next three weeks, the volunteers were required to perform randomly the exercises at these three intensities. After the two first repetitions, the volunteers were questioned about how many repetitions they believed they could achieve until failure (self-estimated). Additionally, volunteers were asked to indicate their exertion according Borg scale. After volunteers performed every exercise until concentric failure to complete the repetition maximum test (RMs test). The data were analyzed using linear regression, Pearson correlation and paired t-test. The results showed that the self-estimated number of repetitions underestimated 44% and 30% of the mean values of repetition maximum obtained directly at intensities of 50% and 70% (p < 0.05), respectively. Although repetition maximum were correlated with Borg scale (r = -0.23 to -0.41; p < 0.05) and self-estimated number of repetitions (r = 0.25 to 0.41; p < 0.05), the standard errors of estimate obtained by linear regression were very high (40% to 49%), which prevented any estimation equations. In conclusion, the perception of effort during the two first repetitions is not a satisfactory strategy for estimating the strength-training zone.https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zoneResistance trainingPerception of effortRating of perceived effortBorg scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Estela Altoé Lemos
Leonardo Carvalho Caldas
Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo
André Soares Leopoldo
Lucas Guimarães Ferreira
Wellington Lunz
spellingShingle Estela Altoé Lemos
Leonardo Carvalho Caldas
Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo
André Soares Leopoldo
Lucas Guimarães Ferreira
Wellington Lunz
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Resistance training
Perception of effort
Rating of perceived effort
Borg scale
author_facet Estela Altoé Lemos
Leonardo Carvalho Caldas
Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo
André Soares Leopoldo
Lucas Guimarães Ferreira
Wellington Lunz
author_sort Estela Altoé Lemos
title The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
title_short The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
title_full The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
title_fullStr The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
title_full_unstemmed The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
title_sort perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
publisher University of Alicante
series Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
issn 1988-5202
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM test in seven exercises on strength machines, and the load was calculated to reach 50%, 70% and 90% of the 1-RM. Over the next three weeks, the volunteers were required to perform randomly the exercises at these three intensities. After the two first repetitions, the volunteers were questioned about how many repetitions they believed they could achieve until failure (self-estimated). Additionally, volunteers were asked to indicate their exertion according Borg scale. After volunteers performed every exercise until concentric failure to complete the repetition maximum test (RMs test). The data were analyzed using linear regression, Pearson correlation and paired t-test. The results showed that the self-estimated number of repetitions underestimated 44% and 30% of the mean values of repetition maximum obtained directly at intensities of 50% and 70% (p < 0.05), respectively. Although repetition maximum were correlated with Borg scale (r = -0.23 to -0.41; p < 0.05) and self-estimated number of repetitions (r = 0.25 to 0.41; p < 0.05), the standard errors of estimate obtained by linear regression were very high (40% to 49%), which prevented any estimation equations. In conclusion, the perception of effort during the two first repetitions is not a satisfactory strategy for estimating the strength-training zone.
topic Resistance training
Perception of effort
Rating of perceived effort
Borg scale
url https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zone
work_keys_str_mv AT estelaaltoelemos theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT leonardocarvalhocaldas theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT anapaulalimaleopoldo theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT andresoaresleopoldo theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT lucasguimaraesferreira theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT wellingtonlunz theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT estelaaltoelemos perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT leonardocarvalhocaldas perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT anapaulalimaleopoldo perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT andresoaresleopoldo perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT lucasguimaraesferreira perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
AT wellingtonlunz perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone
_version_ 1725344825133236224