The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone
The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alicante
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Human Sport and Exercise |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zone |
id |
doaj-f1de07f9c5f94deebeafa71a69117434 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f1de07f9c5f94deebeafa71a691174342020-11-25T00:26:18ZengUniversity of AlicanteJournal of Human Sport and Exercise1988-52022017-09-0112359360610.14198/jhse.2017.123.049638The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zoneEstela Altoé Lemos0Leonardo Carvalho Caldas1Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo2André Soares Leopoldo3Lucas Guimarães Ferreira4Wellington Lunz5Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM test in seven exercises on strength machines, and the load was calculated to reach 50%, 70% and 90% of the 1-RM. Over the next three weeks, the volunteers were required to perform randomly the exercises at these three intensities. After the two first repetitions, the volunteers were questioned about how many repetitions they believed they could achieve until failure (self-estimated). Additionally, volunteers were asked to indicate their exertion according Borg scale. After volunteers performed every exercise until concentric failure to complete the repetition maximum test (RMs test). The data were analyzed using linear regression, Pearson correlation and paired t-test. The results showed that the self-estimated number of repetitions underestimated 44% and 30% of the mean values of repetition maximum obtained directly at intensities of 50% and 70% (p < 0.05), respectively. Although repetition maximum were correlated with Borg scale (r = -0.23 to -0.41; p < 0.05) and self-estimated number of repetitions (r = 0.25 to 0.41; p < 0.05), the standard errors of estimate obtained by linear regression were very high (40% to 49%), which prevented any estimation equations. In conclusion, the perception of effort during the two first repetitions is not a satisfactory strategy for estimating the strength-training zone.https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zoneResistance trainingPerception of effortRating of perceived effortBorg scale |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Estela Altoé Lemos Leonardo Carvalho Caldas Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo André Soares Leopoldo Lucas Guimarães Ferreira Wellington Lunz |
spellingShingle |
Estela Altoé Lemos Leonardo Carvalho Caldas Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo André Soares Leopoldo Lucas Guimarães Ferreira Wellington Lunz The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone Journal of Human Sport and Exercise Resistance training Perception of effort Rating of perceived effort Borg scale |
author_facet |
Estela Altoé Lemos Leonardo Carvalho Caldas Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo André Soares Leopoldo Lucas Guimarães Ferreira Wellington Lunz |
author_sort |
Estela Altoé Lemos |
title |
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
title_short |
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
title_full |
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
title_fullStr |
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
title_full_unstemmed |
The perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
title_sort |
perception of effort is not a valid tool for establishing the strength-training zone |
publisher |
University of Alicante |
series |
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise |
issn |
1988-5202 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
The main purpose was to investigate whether the perception of effort during the two first repetitions of strength exercises could be an adequate strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. The sample comprised 11 women (18 to 35 years-old). In the first week, the volunteers performed a 1-RM test in seven exercises on strength machines, and the load was calculated to reach 50%, 70% and 90% of the 1-RM. Over the next three weeks, the volunteers were required to perform randomly the exercises at these three intensities. After the two first repetitions, the volunteers were questioned about how many repetitions they believed they could achieve until failure (self-estimated). Additionally, volunteers were asked to indicate their exertion according Borg scale. After volunteers performed every exercise until concentric failure to complete the repetition maximum test (RMs test). The data were analyzed using linear regression, Pearson correlation and paired t-test. The results showed that the self-estimated number of repetitions underestimated 44% and 30% of the mean values of repetition maximum obtained directly at intensities of 50% and 70% (p < 0.05), respectively. Although repetition maximum were correlated with Borg scale (r = -0.23 to -0.41; p < 0.05) and self-estimated number of repetitions (r = 0.25 to 0.41; p < 0.05), the standard errors of estimate obtained by linear regression were very high (40% to 49%), which prevented any estimation equations. In conclusion, the perception of effort during the two first repetitions is not a satisfactory strategy for estimating the strength-training zone. |
topic |
Resistance training Perception of effort Rating of perceived effort Borg scale |
url |
https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2017-v12-n3-perception-effort-valid-tool-establishing-strength-training-zone |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT estelaaltoelemos theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT leonardocarvalhocaldas theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT anapaulalimaleopoldo theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT andresoaresleopoldo theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT lucasguimaraesferreira theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT wellingtonlunz theperceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT estelaaltoelemos perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT leonardocarvalhocaldas perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT anapaulalimaleopoldo perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT andresoaresleopoldo perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT lucasguimaraesferreira perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone AT wellingtonlunz perceptionofeffortisnotavalidtoolforestablishingthestrengthtrainingzone |
_version_ |
1725344825133236224 |