Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep

The safety of retroviral-based systems and the possible transmission of replication-competent virus to patients is a major concern associated with using retroviral vectors for gene therapy. While much effort has been put into the design of safe retroviral production methods and effective in vitro mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Van den Broeke, Arsène Burny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2003-01-01
Series:Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110724303209128
id doaj-f1f5346696624767851be36acd56ebd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1f5346696624767851be36acd56ebd62020-11-25T02:46:53ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology1110-72431110-72512003-01-012003191210.1155/S1110724303209128Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from SheepAnne Van den Broeke0Arsène Burny1Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Bordet Institute, Brussels 1000, BelgiumLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Bordet Institute, Brussels 1000, BelgiumThe safety of retroviral-based systems and the possible transmission of replication-competent virus to patients is a major concern associated with using retroviral vectors for gene therapy. While much effort has been put into the design of safe retroviral production methods and effective in vitro monitoring assays, there is little data evaluating the risks resulting from retroviral vector instability at post-transduction stages especially following in vivo gene delivery. Here, we briefly describe and discuss our observations in an in vivo experimental model based on the inoculation of retroviral vector-transduced tumor cells in sheep. Our data indicates that the in vivo generation of mosaic viruses is a dynamic process and that virus variants, generated by retroviral vector-mediated recombination, may be stored and persist in infected individuals prior to selection at the level of replication. Recombination may not only restore essential viral functions or provide selective advantages in a changing environment but also reestablish or enhance the pathogenic potential of the particular virus undergoing recombination. These observations in sheep break new ground in our understanding of how retroviral vectors may have an impact on the course of a preestablished disease or reactivate dormant or endogenous viruses. The in vivo aspects of vector stability raise important biosafety issues for the future development of safe retroviral vector-based gene therapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110724303209128
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Van den Broeke
Arsène Burny
spellingShingle Anne Van den Broeke
Arsène Burny
Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
author_facet Anne Van den Broeke
Arsène Burny
author_sort Anne Van den Broeke
title Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
title_short Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
title_full Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
title_fullStr Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
title_full_unstemmed Retroviral Vector Biosafety: Lessons from Sheep
title_sort retroviral vector biosafety: lessons from sheep
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
issn 1110-7243
1110-7251
publishDate 2003-01-01
description The safety of retroviral-based systems and the possible transmission of replication-competent virus to patients is a major concern associated with using retroviral vectors for gene therapy. While much effort has been put into the design of safe retroviral production methods and effective in vitro monitoring assays, there is little data evaluating the risks resulting from retroviral vector instability at post-transduction stages especially following in vivo gene delivery. Here, we briefly describe and discuss our observations in an in vivo experimental model based on the inoculation of retroviral vector-transduced tumor cells in sheep. Our data indicates that the in vivo generation of mosaic viruses is a dynamic process and that virus variants, generated by retroviral vector-mediated recombination, may be stored and persist in infected individuals prior to selection at the level of replication. Recombination may not only restore essential viral functions or provide selective advantages in a changing environment but also reestablish or enhance the pathogenic potential of the particular virus undergoing recombination. These observations in sheep break new ground in our understanding of how retroviral vectors may have an impact on the course of a preestablished disease or reactivate dormant or endogenous viruses. The in vivo aspects of vector stability raise important biosafety issues for the future development of safe retroviral vector-based gene therapy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110724303209128
work_keys_str_mv AT annevandenbroeke retroviralvectorbiosafetylessonsfromsheep
AT arseneburny retroviralvectorbiosafetylessonsfromsheep
_version_ 1724756051536904192