Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection

Senescence refers to a cellular state featuring a stable cell‐cycle arrest triggered in response to stress. This response also involves other distinct morphological and intracellular changes including alterations in gene expression and epigenetic modifications, elevated macromolecular damage, metabo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui‐Ling Ou, Reuben Hoffmann, Cristina González‐López, Gary J. Doherty, James E. Korkola, Daniel Muñoz‐Espín
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:Molecular Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12807
id doaj-f762a6bb0f37468c999497ca19af1f9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f762a6bb0f37468c999497ca19af1f9b2021-10-02T00:23:46ZengWileyMolecular Oncology1574-78911878-02612021-10-0115102634267110.1002/1878-0261.12807Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detectionHui‐Ling Ou0Reuben Hoffmann1Cristina González‐López2Gary J. Doherty3James E. Korkola4Daniel Muñoz‐Espín5CRUK Cambridge Centre Early Detection Programme Department of Oncology Hutchison/MRC Research Centre University of Cambridge UKDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Knight Cancer Institute OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR USACRUK Cambridge Centre Early Detection Programme Department of Oncology Hutchison/MRC Research Centre University of Cambridge UKDepartment of Oncology Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge Biomedical Campus UKDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Knight Cancer Institute OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR USACRUK Cambridge Centre Early Detection Programme Department of Oncology Hutchison/MRC Research Centre University of Cambridge UKSenescence refers to a cellular state featuring a stable cell‐cycle arrest triggered in response to stress. This response also involves other distinct morphological and intracellular changes including alterations in gene expression and epigenetic modifications, elevated macromolecular damage, metabolism deregulation and a complex pro‐inflammatory secretory phenotype. The initial demonstration of oncogene‐induced senescence in vitro established senescence as an important tumour‐suppressive mechanism, in addition to apoptosis. Senescence not only halts the proliferation of premalignant cells but also facilitates the clearance of affected cells through immunosurveillance. Failure to clear senescent cells owing to deficient immunosurveillance may, however, lead to a state of chronic inflammation that nurtures a pro‐tumorigenic microenvironment favouring cancer initiation, migration and metastasis. In addition, senescence is a response to post‐therapy genotoxic stress. Therefore, tracking the emergence of senescent cells becomes pivotal to detect potential pro‐tumorigenic events. Current protocols for the in vivo detection of senescence require the analysis of fixed or deep‐frozen tissues, despite a significant clinical need for real‐time bioimaging methods. Accuracy and efficiency of senescence detection are further hampered by a lack of universal and more specific senescence biomarkers. Recently, in an attempt to overcome these hurdles, an assortment of detection tools has been developed. These strategies all have significant potential for clinical utilisation and include flow cytometry combined with histo‐ or cytochemical approaches, nanoparticle‐based targeted delivery of imaging contrast agents, OFF‐ON fluorescent senoprobes, positron emission tomography senoprobes and analysis of circulating SASP factors, extracellular vesicles and cell‐free nucleic acids isolated from plasma. Here, we highlight the occurrence of senescence in neoplasia and advanced tumours, assess the impact of senescence on tumorigenesis and discuss how the ongoing development of senescence detection tools might improve early detection of multiple cancers and response to therapy in the near future.https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12807cancercellular senescencedetectionsenoprobestumour microenvironment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui‐Ling Ou
Reuben Hoffmann
Cristina González‐López
Gary J. Doherty
James E. Korkola
Daniel Muñoz‐Espín
spellingShingle Hui‐Ling Ou
Reuben Hoffmann
Cristina González‐López
Gary J. Doherty
James E. Korkola
Daniel Muñoz‐Espín
Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
Molecular Oncology
cancer
cellular senescence
detection
senoprobes
tumour microenvironment
author_facet Hui‐Ling Ou
Reuben Hoffmann
Cristina González‐López
Gary J. Doherty
James E. Korkola
Daniel Muñoz‐Espín
author_sort Hui‐Ling Ou
title Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
title_short Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
title_full Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
title_fullStr Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
title_full_unstemmed Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
title_sort cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection
publisher Wiley
series Molecular Oncology
issn 1574-7891
1878-0261
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Senescence refers to a cellular state featuring a stable cell‐cycle arrest triggered in response to stress. This response also involves other distinct morphological and intracellular changes including alterations in gene expression and epigenetic modifications, elevated macromolecular damage, metabolism deregulation and a complex pro‐inflammatory secretory phenotype. The initial demonstration of oncogene‐induced senescence in vitro established senescence as an important tumour‐suppressive mechanism, in addition to apoptosis. Senescence not only halts the proliferation of premalignant cells but also facilitates the clearance of affected cells through immunosurveillance. Failure to clear senescent cells owing to deficient immunosurveillance may, however, lead to a state of chronic inflammation that nurtures a pro‐tumorigenic microenvironment favouring cancer initiation, migration and metastasis. In addition, senescence is a response to post‐therapy genotoxic stress. Therefore, tracking the emergence of senescent cells becomes pivotal to detect potential pro‐tumorigenic events. Current protocols for the in vivo detection of senescence require the analysis of fixed or deep‐frozen tissues, despite a significant clinical need for real‐time bioimaging methods. Accuracy and efficiency of senescence detection are further hampered by a lack of universal and more specific senescence biomarkers. Recently, in an attempt to overcome these hurdles, an assortment of detection tools has been developed. These strategies all have significant potential for clinical utilisation and include flow cytometry combined with histo‐ or cytochemical approaches, nanoparticle‐based targeted delivery of imaging contrast agents, OFF‐ON fluorescent senoprobes, positron emission tomography senoprobes and analysis of circulating SASP factors, extracellular vesicles and cell‐free nucleic acids isolated from plasma. Here, we highlight the occurrence of senescence in neoplasia and advanced tumours, assess the impact of senescence on tumorigenesis and discuss how the ongoing development of senescence detection tools might improve early detection of multiple cancers and response to therapy in the near future.
topic cancer
cellular senescence
detection
senoprobes
tumour microenvironment
url https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12807
work_keys_str_mv AT huilingou cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
AT reubenhoffmann cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
AT cristinagonzalezlopez cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
AT garyjdoherty cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
AT jamesekorkola cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
AT danielmunozespin cellularsenescenceincancerfrommechanismstodetection
_version_ 1716860726919823360