A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials

A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials

Abstract Background Incorrect classification of outcomes in clinical trials can lead to biased estimates of treatment effect and reduced power. Ensuring appropriate adjudication methods to minimize outcome misclassification is therefore essential. While there are many reported adjudication approache...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brennan C. Kahan, Brian Feagan, Vipul Jairath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Randomized controlled trial
Outcome adjudication
Outcome assessment
Endpoint adjudication committee
Endpoint review committee
Misclassification
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1995-3

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1995-3

Similar Items