Craig’s Anti–Platonism, Lowe’s Universals, and Christ’s Penal Substitutionary Atonement
William Lane Craig has defended nominalism as a kind of “anti–Platonism.” To him, Platonism is inimical to God’s aseity. More recently, he also has defended the penal substitution of Christ. However, he has not brought the two subjects into dialogue with each other. In this essay, I will attempt to...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Catholic University of Louvain
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | TheoLogica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/55993 |