A critical look at determinate theories of causation in law
My thesis critiques three determinate theories of causation in law: (1) the neutrality of Richard Wright's test for “causes-in-fact”; (2) the use of “abnormality” to distinguish causes from mere conditions in Hart and Honoré's (“H&H”) theory of proximate causation; and, (3) the substi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of British Columbia
2009
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/12620 |