Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 學習與教學研究所 === 92 === The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects, on writing performance and attitude, of “peer assessment” and “the model of peer assessment with discussion” developed by the researcher. According to the results, the research provided some suggestions...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2004
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78301644687504618241 |
id |
ndltd-TW-092NCU05464002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-092NCU054640022016-06-08T04:13:37Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78301644687504618241 Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom 以同儕互評與討論提升小六學童之寫作表現~以行動學習輔具教室為例 Yu Wang 王瑀 碩士 國立中央大學 學習與教學研究所 92 The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects, on writing performance and attitude, of “peer assessment” and “the model of peer assessment with discussion” developed by the researcher. According to the results, the research provided some suggestions and future researches about the implementation of peer assessment during writing instruction. The subjects were 63 six grade students of two classes from wan-feng elementary school in Taipei City. The research was pretest-posttest design with two nonequivalent groups of quasi-experimental design. The subjects were divided into two groups. The first experimental group(N=33)accepted the instruction of “peer assessment”, while the second experimental group(N=30) accepted the instruction of “The Model of Peer Assessment and Discussion”. The experiment continued with ten weeks, the data were analyzed as follow: 1.The criterion of writing performance for expository articles was used to measure the writing performance during pretesting and posttesting , and applying twelve one-way ANCOVA statistics to test the divergence of two groups on posttesting. 2.The questionnaire of curriculum was used to measure the attitude of writing and curriculum, and applying t-test to test the divergence of two experimental groups. 3.Applying “the method of discourse analysis” to analysis the content of peer discussion. The findings were as follows: 1.The whole writing performances of the second experimental group were better than the first experimental group. 2.The middle grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the middle grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of rhetoric. 3.The high grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the high grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of structure. 4.The high grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the high grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of content. 5.The second experimental group were better than the first experimental group on attitude of writing and curriculum. The result above illustrated some meaning as follow: The peer discussion after peer assessment promote the effect of “The Model of Peer Assessment and Discussion” developed by the researcher, also help the development of the writing performance of students. According the results of the research, the researcher also proceed the discussion, and provide some recommendations for instruction and research in the future. hwa-wei Ko 柯華葳 劉子鍵 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 145 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 學習與教學研究所 === 92 === The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects, on writing performance and attitude, of “peer assessment” and “the model of peer assessment with discussion” developed by the researcher. According to the results, the research provided some suggestions and future researches about the implementation of peer assessment during writing instruction.
The subjects were 63 six grade students of two classes from wan-feng elementary school in Taipei City. The research was pretest-posttest design with two nonequivalent groups of quasi-experimental design. The subjects were divided into two groups. The first experimental group(N=33)accepted the instruction of “peer assessment”, while the second experimental group(N=30) accepted the instruction of “The Model of Peer Assessment and Discussion”.
The experiment continued with ten weeks, the data were analyzed as follow:
1.The criterion of writing performance for expository articles was used to measure the writing performance during pretesting and posttesting , and applying twelve one-way ANCOVA statistics to test the divergence of two groups on posttesting.
2.The questionnaire of curriculum was used to measure the attitude of writing and curriculum, and applying t-test to test the divergence of two experimental groups.
3.Applying “the method of discourse analysis” to analysis the content of peer discussion.
The findings were as follows:
1.The whole writing performances of the second experimental group were better than the first experimental group.
2.The middle grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the middle grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of rhetoric.
3.The high grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the high grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of structure.
4.The high grade and low grade students of second experimental group were better than the high grade and low grade students of first experimental group on the performance of content.
5.The second experimental group were better than the first experimental group on attitude of writing and curriculum.
The result above illustrated some meaning as follow:
The peer discussion after peer assessment promote the effect of “The Model of Peer Assessment and Discussion” developed by the researcher, also help the development of the writing performance of students. According the results of the research, the researcher also proceed the discussion, and provide some recommendations for instruction and research in the future.
|
author2 |
hwa-wei Ko |
author_facet |
hwa-wei Ko Yu Wang 王瑀 |
author |
Yu Wang 王瑀 |
spellingShingle |
Yu Wang 王瑀 Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
author_sort |
Yu Wang |
title |
Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
title_short |
Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
title_full |
Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
title_fullStr |
Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
title_full_unstemmed |
Applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~The example of Mobile learning device classroom |
title_sort |
applying peer assessment and peer discussion to promot the writing performance of six-grade students.~the example of mobile learning device classroom |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78301644687504618241 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuwang applyingpeerassessmentandpeerdiscussiontopromotthewritingperformanceofsixgradestudentstheexampleofmobilelearningdeviceclassroom AT wángyǔ applyingpeerassessmentandpeerdiscussiontopromotthewritingperformanceofsixgradestudentstheexampleofmobilelearningdeviceclassroom AT yuwang yǐtóngcháihùpíngyǔtǎolùntíshēngxiǎoliùxuétóngzhīxiězuòbiǎoxiànyǐxíngdòngxuéxífǔjùjiàoshìwèilì AT wángyǔ yǐtóngcháihùpíngyǔtǎolùntíshēngxiǎoliùxuétóngzhīxiězuòbiǎoxiànyǐxíngdòngxuéxífǔjùjiàoshìwèilì |
_version_ |
1718298053712019456 |