A study of the relationship between explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses in the junior schools students

碩士 === 國立臺南大學 === 教育學系課程與教學碩士班 === 98 === This study aimed to understand the relationship between the explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses in the junior schools students. The study used a questionnaire survey method and the subjects were junior schools students in Tainan. A questio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen-chen Huang, 黃真真
Other Authors: Hsiu-Shuang Huang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/79710702373095680380
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺南大學 === 教育學系課程與教學碩士班 === 98 === This study aimed to understand the relationship between the explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses in the junior schools students. The study used a questionnaire survey method and the subjects were junior schools students in Tainan. A questionnaire survey was conducted using stratified random sampling method according to the school size. There were 785 valid samples. The test material was “questionnaire of the relationship between the explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses in the junior schools”, adapted by the author. The data were analyzed by using SPSS to conduct Pearson test, ANOVA, and stepwise multiple regression, in order to verify research hypotheses. The conclusions of the research were summarized below: 1. The explanation styles of junior high school students tended to be internal, temporary, and specific. 2. The frustration tolerance of junior high school students was moderate. They scored the highest on “behavioral tendency after frustration” and “emotional feeling after frustration”, and lowest on “frustration adventure.” 3. The order of junior high schools students’ stress degree, from high to low, was “academic stress", "physical and mental development stress," "family stress", "stress on personal relationships," "heterosexual contact stress." 4. The explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses of some students with different background variables were significantly different. 5. Students’ explanation styles, frustration tolerance and stresses were correlated with each other