A Case Study on Franchising Decision Process in Taiwan’s ChainConvenience Stores

碩士 === 雲林科技大學 === 企業管理系碩士班 === 98 === “Opportunity recognition” and “opportunity development and evaluation” are the major contents in entrepreneurship research, but there is lack of thorough study on franchising decision-making process currently. The topic of this study takes five franchisee of Tai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pei-yuan Huang, 黃姵媛
Other Authors: Chih-Yuan Chen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71087956996259709172
Description
Summary:碩士 === 雲林科技大學 === 企業管理系碩士班 === 98 === “Opportunity recognition” and “opportunity development and evaluation” are the major contents in entrepreneurship research, but there is lack of thorough study on franchising decision-making process currently. The topic of this study takes five franchisee of Taiwan of chain convenience stores for example. The research revised Kaufmann’s decision making process model through case interviews and literature review, and established the new complete model of franchising decision-making process. In addition to raising new model of franchising decision-making process, the study has following observations based on case study of comparative analysis. 1. Franchisees with relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “prior knowledge” in “industry decision” and “organizational type decision”. Franchisees with no relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “social networks” in “industry decision” and “organizational type decision”. 2. Franchisees with relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “prior knowledge” and “potential financial rewards” in “brand decision”. Franchisees with no relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “social networks” and “potential financial rewards” in “brand decision”. 3. Franchisees with relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “prior knowledge”, “potential financial rewards” and “financial resources of franchisors” in “sector decision (franchise/authorized)”. Franchisees with no relevant industry prior knowledge will be subject to “social networks” and “potential financial v rewards” and “financial resources of franchisors” in “sector decision (franchise/authorized)”. 4. Whether having prior knowledge of related industries or not, franchisees’ “site selection” will be influenced by “potential financial rewards” and “management knowledge of franchisors”. 5. In repeat entrepreneurial stage, franchisees’ “extending store decision” will be influenced by “prior knowledge of previous store”, “potential financial rewards”, “financial resources of franchisors”, “management knowledge of franchisors” and “human resources of franchisors”. 6. In repeat entrepreneurial stage, franchisees’ “site section of extending store” will be influenced by “prior knowledge of previous store”, “potential financial rewards”, “management knowledge of franchisors”, and “human resources of franchisors”. 7. Franchisees with prior knowledge adopt the “heuristic approach” decision-making model in the early opportunity recognition. Franchisees with no prior knowledge adopt the “Effectuation approach” decision-making model by “social networks” in the early opportunity recognition, but also may have “heuristic approach”. 8. Whether having prior knowledge or not, after joining the franchising system, the resources and assistance of franchisors enable franchisees less taken the decision of effectuation. 9. Franchisors provide relevant industry knowledge and resources to help entrepreneurs simplify the decision-making process and reduce the risk of venture. 10. Starting an enterprise by franchise and in order to increase the number of potential financial reward, franchisees should set goal in multi-stores.