Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect
碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 100 === Spacing effect is the introduction of space during practice or before retention test that can effectively promote learning. This study investigated practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning when different forms of space were intr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2012
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42548395547983404545 |
id |
ndltd-TW-100NTNU5567040 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-100NTNU55670402016-03-28T04:20:20Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42548395547983404545 Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect 特定性練習對空間性動作表現與學習之影響:間隔效應之檢驗 Huang, Kai-Chieh 黃愷婕 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 體育學系 100 Spacing effect is the introduction of space during practice or before retention test that can effectively promote learning. This study investigated practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning when different forms of space were introduced in the practice of specificity. To examine different forms of spacing in the practice of specificity groups, forty-two right hander adults were randomly assigned to three groups (specificity, specificity and space, and serial practice ). Homogeneity was confirmed through outward arm movement test among three groups before proceeding to linear positioning experimental tasks. Absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) were designed as dependant variables. One- way ANOVA was used to examine movement performance in acquisition. The results indicated that the AE value of specificity group was significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group and specificity + space group; The VE value of specificity group and specificity + space group were significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group. In retention test of learning effect: The AE value of specificity + space group was significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group and specificity group; the AE value of serial practice group was significantly lower (p < .05) than specificity group. The AE value of three groups in retention had no significantly difference (p > .05). The conclusion of this study: (1) the accuracy and stability of movement of specificity practice that had interfered space did not increase the spatial movement performance; and (2) The accuracy of movement of specificity practice had interfered space increased the spatial motor learning. Hank Junling Jwo 卓俊伶 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 100 === Spacing effect is the introduction of space during practice or before retention test that can effectively promote learning. This study investigated practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning when different forms of space were introduced in the practice of specificity. To examine different forms of spacing in the practice of specificity groups, forty-two right hander adults were randomly assigned to three groups (specificity, specificity and space, and serial practice ). Homogeneity was confirmed through outward arm movement test among three groups before proceeding to linear positioning experimental tasks. Absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) were designed as dependant variables. One- way ANOVA was used to examine movement performance in acquisition. The results indicated that the AE value of specificity group was significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group and specificity + space group; The VE value of specificity group and specificity + space group were significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group. In retention test of learning effect: The AE value of specificity + space group was significantly lower (p < .05) than serial practice group and specificity group; the AE value of serial practice group was significantly lower (p < .05) than specificity group. The AE value of three groups in retention had no significantly difference (p > .05). The conclusion of this study: (1) the accuracy and stability of movement of specificity practice that had interfered space did not increase the spatial movement performance; and (2) The accuracy of movement of specificity practice had interfered space increased the spatial motor learning.
|
author2 |
Hank Junling Jwo |
author_facet |
Hank Junling Jwo Huang, Kai-Chieh 黃愷婕 |
author |
Huang, Kai-Chieh 黃愷婕 |
spellingShingle |
Huang, Kai-Chieh 黃愷婕 Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
author_sort |
Huang, Kai-Chieh |
title |
Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
title_short |
Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
title_full |
Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
title_fullStr |
Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:Examination of spacing effect |
title_sort |
practice of specificity effect on spatial movement performance and learning:examination of spacing effect |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42548395547983404545 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huangkaichieh practiceofspecificityeffectonspatialmovementperformanceandlearningexaminationofspacingeffect AT huángkǎijié practiceofspecificityeffectonspatialmovementperformanceandlearningexaminationofspacingeffect AT huangkaichieh tèdìngxìngliànxíduìkōngjiānxìngdòngzuòbiǎoxiànyǔxuéxízhīyǐngxiǎngjiāngéxiàoyīngzhījiǎnyàn AT huángkǎijié tèdìngxìngliànxíduìkōngjiānxìngdòngzuòbiǎoxiànyǔxuéxízhīyǐngxiǎngjiāngéxiàoyīngzhījiǎnyàn |
_version_ |
1718212236752715776 |