Analysis on the Effect of Transit Joint Development Building''s Household Modal Choice Behaviors for the Parking Demand

• Main Authors: Guo-Yu Mao, 毛國裕
• Other Authors: 陳敦基
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2013
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/21909622319815666558

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 運輸管理學系碩士班 === 101 === Transit joint development buildings’ are differing from community buildings’ since it locate on MRT station. Above all, it shortens walk distance of home among station; it also obviously increases public transportation accessibility. However, it limits in MRT station facility, to bring its underground space has a few different from be required quantity of the sedan cars parking; further, it causes development progress rate that was delayed. It can explain that in the process of city design deliberation, Transit joint development buildings’ sedan cars relevant usages and features are not enough comprehended, this is why the loss is hard to calculate the cost. Base on the study exploit individual choice model to build household transportation choice behavior model through resident survey, it can get actual effective factors between sedan cars and public transportations. It points out Transit joint development buildings’ for society as a whole benefits. On this point, it is able to compile vital data, and then analyze it. The result shows as follows: 1.In term of the Logit model calibrated, floor plan and parking supply rate increased, it illustrate more positive utility for sedan possessions or using. On contrast, it will influence on public transportations obviously. 2.In household traveler economic assess, whether possess sedan cars or not, it utility both present decrease condition after live in; instead, using public transportation present increase condition. 3.In environment assess, carbon emission decrease 29.2%. Compare with before, the carbon decreases 26.9 ton/year. About air pollution, it can found decrease emission approximately 50% up; especially Nitrogen oxides decrease the highest, almost 62.01%. 4.According to flexible analysis, MRT co-house depends upon floor plan and parking supply rate to change. The floor plan and rate increase, the sedan cars possession chance would be raise. Also, the parking supply limit policy was conducted, sedan cars cost will increase. As a result, through analysis data that know sedan cars use rate will decrease. Otherwise, the public transportation will increase. By way of this study analysis result, it can be a plan and promote policy’s reference of Transit joint development buildings.