To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans

博士 === 國立中央大學 === 學習與教學研究所 === 102 === Engineering accreditation has been implemented for ten years in Taiwan. The aims of this study attempt to explore what impact, has the accreditation had on curriculum and instruction of the programs, faculty development and students learning outcomes, and analy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miao-chen Lin, 林妙真
Other Authors: Pei-feng Chang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67hrr5
id ndltd-TW-102NCU05464007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-102NCU054640072019-05-15T21:32:35Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67hrr5 To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans 工程及科技教育認證制度實施之研究:大學教師之觀點 Miao-chen Lin 林妙真 博士 國立中央大學 學習與教學研究所 102 Engineering accreditation has been implemented for ten years in Taiwan. The aims of this study attempt to explore what impact, has the accreditation had on curriculum and instruction of the programs, faculty development and students learning outcomes, and analyze the political structures within the programs and the operations of social systems on the processes of accreditation. The research approach of this study is mixed-methods research. The data were collected by questionnaire survey, in-depth interview and participant observation. The population of this study was 7706 faculty members from engineering programs passed by engineering accreditation until 2011. 1135 questionnaires were sent, and the total valid returned questionnaires were 489. Data were analyzed by the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean and standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA. Finally, twenty engineering faculty members, program chairpersons, and deans were interviewed. Consequently, both the Soft Systems Methodology and general inductive approach were adopted to analyze and interpret the qualitative data. Based on the results of various data from literature review, questionnaires and interviews, the following seven points are summarized: 1. Engineering Accreditation in Taiwan was implemented mostly by top-down, and it resulted in a lack of faculty’s identity. 2. Program chairperson played an important role in the engineering accreditation implementation; program chairperson’s attitude made significant impact on the continuous improvement of to-be-accredited programs. 3. The survey showed that faculty members generally felt positive changes from engineering accreditation, but this result was inconsistent with interview contents. 4. Faculty who served as administrators of the university tended to have more in-depth consciousness toward the impact of accreditation upon curriculum and instruction, faculty development, and student learning outcomes. 5. If faculty didn’t understand what the engineering accreditation is all about, it tended to affect their identity to be involved. 6. Even though most of the faculty agreed the aim and mechanism of engineering accreditation, they still doubt that weather the continuous improvement could be accomplished by implementing the accreditation. 7. The best practice of engineering accreditation only happened when the internal values of the faculty and the norms of programs had reached balance. There have been few studies to analyze the effects of engineering accreditation and the internal political structures of programs and the operations of social systems on the processes of accreditation through qualitative approach. This study wishes to serve as a basis for further study of evaluating the effectiveness of engineering accreditation in Taiwan. Pei-feng Chang 張佩芬 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 204 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立中央大學 === 學習與教學研究所 === 102 === Engineering accreditation has been implemented for ten years in Taiwan. The aims of this study attempt to explore what impact, has the accreditation had on curriculum and instruction of the programs, faculty development and students learning outcomes, and analyze the political structures within the programs and the operations of social systems on the processes of accreditation. The research approach of this study is mixed-methods research. The data were collected by questionnaire survey, in-depth interview and participant observation. The population of this study was 7706 faculty members from engineering programs passed by engineering accreditation until 2011. 1135 questionnaires were sent, and the total valid returned questionnaires were 489. Data were analyzed by the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean and standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA. Finally, twenty engineering faculty members, program chairpersons, and deans were interviewed. Consequently, both the Soft Systems Methodology and general inductive approach were adopted to analyze and interpret the qualitative data. Based on the results of various data from literature review, questionnaires and interviews, the following seven points are summarized: 1. Engineering Accreditation in Taiwan was implemented mostly by top-down, and it resulted in a lack of faculty’s identity. 2. Program chairperson played an important role in the engineering accreditation implementation; program chairperson’s attitude made significant impact on the continuous improvement of to-be-accredited programs. 3. The survey showed that faculty members generally felt positive changes from engineering accreditation, but this result was inconsistent with interview contents. 4. Faculty who served as administrators of the university tended to have more in-depth consciousness toward the impact of accreditation upon curriculum and instruction, faculty development, and student learning outcomes. 5. If faculty didn’t understand what the engineering accreditation is all about, it tended to affect their identity to be involved. 6. Even though most of the faculty agreed the aim and mechanism of engineering accreditation, they still doubt that weather the continuous improvement could be accomplished by implementing the accreditation. 7. The best practice of engineering accreditation only happened when the internal values of the faculty and the norms of programs had reached balance. There have been few studies to analyze the effects of engineering accreditation and the internal political structures of programs and the operations of social systems on the processes of accreditation through qualitative approach. This study wishes to serve as a basis for further study of evaluating the effectiveness of engineering accreditation in Taiwan.
author2 Pei-feng Chang
author_facet Pei-feng Chang
Miao-chen Lin
林妙真
author Miao-chen Lin
林妙真
spellingShingle Miao-chen Lin
林妙真
To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
author_sort Miao-chen Lin
title To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
title_short To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
title_full To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
title_fullStr To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
title_full_unstemmed To Explore the Impact of Implementing of Engineering Accreditation: The Perspectives of Faculty, Chairpersons and Deans
title_sort to explore the impact of implementing of engineering accreditation: the perspectives of faculty, chairpersons and deans
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67hrr5
work_keys_str_mv AT miaochenlin toexploretheimpactofimplementingofengineeringaccreditationtheperspectivesoffacultychairpersonsanddeans
AT línmiàozhēn toexploretheimpactofimplementingofengineeringaccreditationtheperspectivesoffacultychairpersonsanddeans
AT miaochenlin gōngchéngjíkējìjiàoyùrènzhèngzhìdùshíshīzhīyánjiūdàxuéjiàoshīzhīguāndiǎn
AT línmiàozhēn gōngchéngjíkējìjiàoyùrènzhèngzhìdùshíshīzhīyánjiūdàxuéjiàoshīzhīguāndiǎn
_version_ 1719115456637304832