Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination

碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 經濟學系 === 104 === This paper shows how a monopolistic firm uses menu pricing to practice price discrimination when consumers face demand uncertainty and are risk averse. To this end, this paper uses mean-variance utility form to define consumers’ expected utility, and look for t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEE HSIU-CHUNG, 李秀中
Other Authors: ChIU HSIEN-HUNG
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29994897026279325833
id ndltd-TW-104NCNU0389001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104NCNU03890012017-07-09T04:30:25Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29994897026279325833 Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination 消費者風險態度與廠商的差別取價行為 LEE HSIU-CHUNG 李秀中 碩士 國立暨南國際大學 經濟學系 104 This paper shows how a monopolistic firm uses menu pricing to practice price discrimination when consumers face demand uncertainty and are risk averse. To this end, this paper uses mean-variance utility form to define consumers’ expected utility, and look for the optimal decision for the firm. This paper discusses two forms of menu pricing: 1) the menu with refundable goods and non-refundable goods; 2) the menu with advanced sale good and spot sale good. We compare menu pricing, menu profits, and social welfare between two these two menus. We find that the menu with advanced sale good and spot sale good leads to a higher seller’s profit as well as higher social welfare than the other menu. As for optimal pricing, we find that the price of advanced sale and non-refundable goods always decrease with consumers’ demand uncertainty. By contrast, the price of the refundable goods has a non-monotonic relationship with consumers’ demand uncertainty. ChIU HSIEN-HUNG 邱顯鴻 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 43 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 經濟學系 === 104 === This paper shows how a monopolistic firm uses menu pricing to practice price discrimination when consumers face demand uncertainty and are risk averse. To this end, this paper uses mean-variance utility form to define consumers’ expected utility, and look for the optimal decision for the firm. This paper discusses two forms of menu pricing: 1) the menu with refundable goods and non-refundable goods; 2) the menu with advanced sale good and spot sale good. We compare menu pricing, menu profits, and social welfare between two these two menus. We find that the menu with advanced sale good and spot sale good leads to a higher seller’s profit as well as higher social welfare than the other menu. As for optimal pricing, we find that the price of advanced sale and non-refundable goods always decrease with consumers’ demand uncertainty. By contrast, the price of the refundable goods has a non-monotonic relationship with consumers’ demand uncertainty.
author2 ChIU HSIEN-HUNG
author_facet ChIU HSIEN-HUNG
LEE HSIU-CHUNG
李秀中
author LEE HSIU-CHUNG
李秀中
spellingShingle LEE HSIU-CHUNG
李秀中
Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
author_sort LEE HSIU-CHUNG
title Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
title_short Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
title_full Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
title_fullStr Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Consumers' Risk Attitude and Price Discrimination
title_sort consumers' risk attitude and price discrimination
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29994897026279325833
work_keys_str_mv AT leehsiuchung consumersriskattitudeandpricediscrimination
AT lǐxiùzhōng consumersriskattitudeandpricediscrimination
AT leehsiuchung xiāofèizhěfēngxiǎntàidùyǔchǎngshāngdechàbiéqǔjiàxíngwèi
AT lǐxiùzhōng xiāofèizhěfēngxiǎntàidùyǔchǎngshāngdechàbiéqǔjiàxíngwèi
_version_ 1718494308038868992