To Create the High-Quality Learning Environment ─ In Case Study of Food and Beverage Department in Vocational High School

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 餐旅管理學系碩士在職專班 === 105 === This study aims to explore the relationship between the demand for learning environment and satisfaction of vocational high school students in the food and beverage department. The main research purpose is to probe into students’ current demand for high-quali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KUO,SHU-FEN, 郭淑芬
Other Authors: KO,WEN-HWA
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/38ux9s
Description
Summary:碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 餐旅管理學系碩士在職專班 === 105 === This study aims to explore the relationship between the demand for learning environment and satisfaction of vocational high school students in the food and beverage department. The main research purpose is to probe into students’ current demand for high-quality learning environment, satisfaction and difference analysis. By IPA, it compares relationship between students’ demand for learning environment and satisfaction. Research subjects were full-time junior students and students in the extension program of vocational high schools in northern Taiwan. A questionnaire survey was conducted and data were analyzed using SPSS. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed, and 500 were retrieved, with a valid return rate of 100%. Based on the research, this study proposes specific suggestions as reference for future curriculum planning of students, teachers and schools. A high quality learning environment of students in the F&B department of vocational high school can be generalized as six dimensions: “environment and planning facility”, “organizational measures”, “teachers’ instructional content”, “teachers’ course design”, “interpersonal interaction” and “social atmosphere”. This study found that that ranking of demand for learning environment is “environment and planning facility”, “teachers’ course design”, “interpersonal interaction”, “organizational measures”, “social atmosphere” and “teachers’ instructional content”; ranking of satisfaction is “teachers’ course design”, “interpersonal interaction”, “social atmosphere”, “teachers’ instructional content”, “organizational measures” and “environment and planning measures”. In 6 dimensions, demand and satisfaction in t test showed significant difference. By IPA, this study compared relationship between students’ demand for and satisfaction with learning environment and the analysis illustrates that environment and planning facility fall in the zone of improvement.