Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers use different strategies to support language acquisition when teaching. This study focuses on one particular strategy: Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF). It is provided to support learners’ oral language skills, and takes numerous potential forms which can e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS)
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-28816 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-28816 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-288162020-11-04T05:30:13ZOral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary SchoolsengKnutsson, MalinKöster, SandraMalmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS)Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS)Malmö universitet/Lärande och samhälle2020oral feedbackcorrective feedbackoral feedback typesteachers' approachstudents' reactions and responses to oral corrective feedbackSocial SciencesSamhällsvetenskapEnglish as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers use different strategies to support language acquisition when teaching. This study focuses on one particular strategy: Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF). It is provided to support learners’ oral language skills, and takes numerous potential forms which can either be implemented implicitly and/or explicitly. According to many studies, recast is the type of OCF most commonly used by EFL teachers. Studies demonstrate however, that recast is the least effective approach for EFL learners’ uptake. The aim of this research study is to investigate how Swedish EFL teachers provide students with OCF. In addition, the intention is also to explore teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the usefulness of OCF for their skills development in English. The focus of this research study is on Swedish primary schools of grades 4-6. Two types of data-gathering methods were used in this study: interviews and observations. The results confirm that both explicit and implicit OCF was provided when observing the teachers’ approaches and strategies in classroom settings. Surprisingly, this research study reveals that recast was not favoured by the Swedish EFL teachers as they considered other types of OCF to be more beneficial to EFL classroom settings. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-28816Local 31469application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
oral feedback corrective feedback oral feedback types teachers' approach students' reactions and responses to oral corrective feedback Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap |
spellingShingle |
oral feedback corrective feedback oral feedback types teachers' approach students' reactions and responses to oral corrective feedback Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap Knutsson, Malin Köster, Sandra Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
description |
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers use different strategies to support language acquisition when teaching. This study focuses on one particular strategy: Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF). It is provided to support learners’ oral language skills, and takes numerous potential forms which can either be implemented implicitly and/or explicitly. According to many studies, recast is the type of OCF most commonly used by EFL teachers. Studies demonstrate however, that recast is the least effective approach for EFL learners’ uptake. The aim of this research study is to investigate how Swedish EFL teachers provide students with OCF. In addition, the intention is also to explore teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the usefulness of OCF for their skills development in English. The focus of this research study is on Swedish primary schools of grades 4-6. Two types of data-gathering methods were used in this study: interviews and observations. The results confirm that both explicit and implicit OCF was provided when observing the teachers’ approaches and strategies in classroom settings. Surprisingly, this research study reveals that recast was not favoured by the Swedish EFL teachers as they considered other types of OCF to be more beneficial to EFL classroom settings. |
author |
Knutsson, Malin Köster, Sandra |
author_facet |
Knutsson, Malin Köster, Sandra |
author_sort |
Knutsson, Malin |
title |
Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
title_short |
Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
title_full |
Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
title_fullStr |
Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oral Corrective Feedback in Swedish Primary Schools |
title_sort |
oral corrective feedback in swedish primary schools |
publisher |
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS) |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-28816 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT knutssonmalin oralcorrectivefeedbackinswedishprimaryschools AT kostersandra oralcorrectivefeedbackinswedishprimaryschools |
_version_ |
1719355084096143360 |